Card image cap

Steny Hoyer's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Environment

Office:

On The Ballot: Running, Democratic for U.S. House (MD) - District 5

Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issue concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

With rare exceptions, Vote Smart displays interest group ratings as a 0-100 percentage. While many interest groups use percentages as ratings to begin with, please note that Vote Smart has translated some ratings to a percentage from a different rating system for consistency and ease in understanding. Please visit the group's website, email us at ratings@votesmart.org or call our Voter Information Hotline at 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

6%
2015-2016
16%
2013-2014
42%
2011-2012
50%
2007-2008
16%
2005-2006
25%
2003-2004
100%
2003-2004
100%
2003-2004
100%
2003
25%
1999-2000
25%
1999-2000
100
2007
100%
2005
100%
2003-2004
60%
2001-2002
100%
2004
100%
2019-2020
100%
2019-2020
100%
2017-2018
100%
2017-2018
93%
2015-2016
93%
2015-2016
100%
2013-2014
100%
2013-2014
100%
2011-2012
100%
2011-2012
67%
2022
100%
2021-2022
100%
2021
100%
2020
100%
2019
100%
2018
100%
2017
100%
2016
100%
2015
83%
2013
100%
2011-2012
100%
2011
86%
2009-2010
80%
2009
88%
2007-2008
90%
2007
96%
2005-2006
100%
2004
93%
2015-2016
93%
2015-2016
100%
2015
93%
2014
91%
2013
100%
2011-2012
100%
2011-2012
96%
2011
100%
2009
100%
2008
100%
2020
100%
2020
95%
2018
100%
2017
100%
2017
100%
2015-2016
100%
2015-2016
100%
2015
100%
2015
89%
2014
89%
2013-2014
89%
2013-2014
92%
2013
93%
2011-2012
93%
2011-2012
57%
2006-2012
57%
2006-2012
92%
2023
83%
2022
95%
2022
100%
2021
83%
2021
82%
2020
100%
2020
98%
2019-2020
82%
2019
97%
2019
81%
2018
63%
2018
80%
2017-2018
97%
2017
82%
2017
92%
2016
82%
2016
90%
2015-2016
80%
2014
87%
2013-2014
82%
2013
80%
2013
80%
2012
91%
2012
94%
2011-2012
79%
2011
97%
2011
77%
2010
100%
2010
92%
2009-2010
86%
2009
91%
2007-2008
90%
2007
100%
2006
83%
2005
90%
2003-2004
85%
2003
86%
2001-2002
73%
1999-2000
69%
1999
83%
1998
69%
1997
77%
1995-1996
100%
2021-2022
100%
2021-2022
100%
2019-2020
100%
2015-2016
100%
2014
86%
2011-2012
92%
2009-2010
100%
2003-2004
83%
2001-2002
75%
2017-2018
0%
2005-2006
100%
2011
100%
2011
100%
2003
100%
2003
arrow_upward