Card image cap

Richard Neal's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Agriculture and Food

Office:

Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issue concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

With rare exceptions, Vote Smart displays interest group ratings as a 0-100 percentage. While many interest groups use percentages as ratings to begin with, please note that Vote Smart has translated some ratings to a percentage from a different rating system for consistency and ease in understanding. Please visit the group's website, email us at ratings@votesmart.org or call our Voter Information Hotline at 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

50%
2019-2020
0%
2017-2018
15%
2015-2016
20%
2013-2014
17%
2011-2012
0%
2009-2010
0%
2001
50%
2014
15%
2011
33%
2009-2010
92%
2007-2008
23%
2005-2006
33%
2000
27%
1999
22%
1995-1996
14%
1993-1994
90%
2020
94%
2018
100%
2017
100%
2017
100%
2015-2016
100%
2015-2016
100%
2015
100%
2015
84%
2014
84%
2013-2014
84%
2013-2014
85%
2013
100%
2011-2012
100%
2011-2012
53%
2007-2008
14%
2001-2002
14%
2001-2002
60%
1991-1992
33%
2012
100%
2009-2010
100%
2009-2010
100
2007-2008
100
2007-2008
100%
2005-2006
100%
2005-2006
100%
2003-2004
100%
2003-2004
100%
2001-2002
100%
2001-2002
67%
1999-2000
67%
1999-2000
78%
1998
43%
1997
82%
1996
80%
1995
78%
1994
78%
1993
80%
2018
100%
2007
Fence Sitter
2002
Fence Sitter
2002
arrow_upward