WE TRACK THOUSANDS OF POLITICIANS EACH AND EVERY DAY!

Their Biographies, Issue Positions, Voting Records, Public Statements, Ratings and their Funders.
Card image cap

Andy Biggs' Ratings and Endorsements

Office: U.S. House (AZ) - District 5, Republican

Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issue concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

With rare exceptions, Vote Smart displays interest group ratings as a 0-100 percentage. While many interest groups use percentages as ratings to begin with, please note that Vote Smart has translated some ratings to a percentage from a different rating system for consistency and ease in understanding. Please visit the group's website, email us at ratings@votesmart.org or call our Voter Information Hotline at 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

100%
2017-2018
89%
2017-2018
A+
2003-2004
0%
2017
11%
2017-2018
11%
2017-2018
0%
2017
0%
2017
100%
2017-2018
33%
2003-2004
100%
2010-2011
100%
2017-2018
100%
2017-2018
100%
2017-2018
100%
2018
86%
2012
86%
2012
71%
2012
86%
2012
86%
2012
71%
2011
73%
2011
86%
2011
93%
2011
93%
2011
59%
2010
80%
2010
70%
2010
78%
2010
71%
2010
76%
2009
75%
2009
68%
2009
86%
2009
83%
2009
79
2008
79%
2008
69%
2008
82%
2008
86%
2008
67%
2007
70%
2006
76%
2005
67%
2004
66%
2003
91%
2017-2018
80%
2017-2018
80%
2017-2018
87%
2017-2018
87%
2017-2018
100%
2017-2018
100%
2017-2018
100%
2017-2018
100%
2017-2018
100%
2017-2018
91%
2017-2018
100%
2018
100%
2017
100%
2017
10%
2017
5%
2019-2020
5%
2019-2020
14%
2019-2020
14%
2019-2020
4%
2019-2020
4%
2019-2020
0%
2017-2018
0%
2017-2018
97%
2017
0%
2018
11%
2017
97%
2017
97%
2017
18%
2017
18%
2017
25%
2017
99%
2019
99%
2019
100%
2017-2018
100%
2017-2018
%
1989-2019
%
1989-2019
100%
1989-2018
100%
1989-2018
100%
1989-2017
100%
1989-2017
86%
2017-2018
100%
2017-2018
100%
2015
100%
2014
100%
2012
83%
2011
89%
2009
93%
2008
95%
2006
89%
2005
100%
2004
100%
2018
100%
2018
89%
2017
89%
2017
20%
2017
0%
2014
81%
2017-2018
81%
2017-2018
93%
2017
93%
2017
93%
2017
94%
2016
92%
2016
92%
2016
94%
2016
90%
2015
90%
2015
95%
2015
95%
2015
100%
2017-2018
91%
2017-2018
80%
2017-2018
80%
2017-2018
4%
2019-2020
4%
2019-2020
7%
2019-2020
7%
2019-2020
5%
2019-2020
5%
2019-2020
14%
2019-2020
14%
2019-2020
14%
2019-2020
14%
2019-2020
4%
2019-2020
4%
2019-2020
5%
2019-2020
5%
2019-2020
0%
2017
0%
2017
arrow_upward