Card image cap

Luke Messer's Ratings and Endorsements

Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issue concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

With rare exceptions, Vote Smart displays interest group ratings as a 0-100 percentage. While many interest groups use percentages as ratings to begin with, please note that Vote Smart has translated some ratings to a percentage from a different rating system for consistency and ease in understanding. Please visit the group's website, email us at ratings@votesmart.org or call our Voter Information Hotline at 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

85%
2015-2016
80%
2013-2014
82%
2015-2016
50%
2006
0%
2017
25%
2015-2016
25%
2015-2016
27%
2015
11%
2014
11%
2013-2014
11%
2013-2014
8%
2013
0%
2016
25%
2018
6%
2015-2016
11%
2013-2014
11%
2013-2014
100%
2017-2018
100%
2017-2018
86%
2016
97%
2015-2016
97%
2015-2016
78%
2015
94%
2015
67%
2014
67%
2014
50%
2014
50%
2014
100%
2015-2016
100%
2013-2014
50%
2006
100%
2017-2018
86%
2012-2013
96%
2015-2016
98%
2015
100%
2013-2014
100%
2013-2014
100%
2013-2014
100%
2013-2014
100%
2013-2014
100%
2013-2014
70%
2013-2014
11%
2016
11%
2016
16%
2017
16%
2017
60%
2015-2016
60%
2015-2016
13%
2015-2016
14%
2013-2014
11%
2016
11%
2016
59%
2014
32%
2015-2016
32%
2015-2016
0%
2014
0%
2013-2014
0%
2013-2014
50%
2014
50%
2014
100%
2005
100%
2005
100%
2004
100%
2004
93%
2015-2016
100%
2013-2014
92%
2013
42%
2016
61%
2014
57%
2013-2014
57%
2013-2014
33%
2013
33%
2013
91%
2013-2014
70%
2015-2016
67%
2014
50%
2014
50%
2014
96%
2013-2014
20%
2013-2014
13%
2013
13%
2013
100%
2017-2018
100%
2017-2018
86%
2016
97%
2015-2016
97%
2015-2016
78%
2015
94%
2015
67%
2014
67%
2014
14%
2013
11%
2016
11%
2016
0%
2015-2016
0%
2015-2016
0%
2013-2014
0%
2013-2014
91%
2015-2016
91%
2015-2016
82%
2015-2016
50%
2006
100%
2015-2016
100%
2013-2014
82%
2015-2016
50%
2006
3%
2017-2018
3%
2017-2018
0%
2015-2016
0%
2015-2016
0%
2015
0%
2014
0%
2013
0%
2017
25%
2015-2016
25%
2015-2016
27%
2015
11%
2014
11%
2013-2014
11%
2013-2014
8%
2013
75%
2014
100%
2017-2018
93%
2015-2016
100%
2013-2014
90%
2014
100%
2017-2018
100%
2017-2018
86%
2016
97%
2015-2016
97%
2015-2016
78%
2015
94%
2015
67%
2014
67%
2014
33%
2017
100%
2016
82%
2015
100%
2014
85%
2013
44%
2014
44%
2014
95%
2015-2016
93%
2013-2014
79%
2016
81%
2015
79%
2013
40%
2013
70%
2013
100%
2013
66%
2018
81%
2017
98%
2017
76%
2016
84%
2016
74%
2015
74%
2015
74%
2014
66%
2014
81%
2013
81%
2013
50%
2015-2016
50%
2015-2016
11%
2014
11%
2014
10%
2013-2014
10%
2013-2014
2%
2012
2%
2012
85%
2015-2016
80%
2013-2014
0%
2017
25%
2015-2016
25%
2015-2016
27%
2015
11%
2014
11%
2013-2014
11%
2013-2014
8%
2013
100%
2013
25%
2018
100%
2013-2014
14%
2013
31%
2013-2014
31%
2013-2014
20%
2013
11%
2016
11%
2016
33%
2017
100%
2016
82%
2015
100%
2014
85%
2013
100%
2017
100%
2017
83%
2016
83%
2016
76%
2015
76%
2015
76%
2014
76%
2014
67%
2013
67%
2013
44%
2014
44%
2014
30%
2015-2016
30%
2015-2016
29%
2015
29%
2015
7%
2013-2014
7%
2013-2014
33%
2013-2014
14%
2013
0%
2017-2018
21%
2013
0%
2013-2014
30%
2015-2016
30%
2015-2016
29%
2015
29%
2015
7%
2013-2014
7%
2013-2014
32%
2015-2016
32%
2015-2016
0%
2014
0%
2013-2014
0%
2013-2014
100%
2015-2016
100%
2015-2016
16%
2017
16%
2017
60%
2015-2016
60%
2015-2016
75%
2014
100%
2017-2018
31%
2013-2014
31%
2013-2014
20%
2013
13%
2015-2016
14%
2013-2014
90%
2014
92%
2013
100%
2013-2014
100%
2013-2014
32%
2015-2016
32%
2015-2016
0%
2014
0%
2013-2014
0%
2013-2014
100%
2017-2018
93%
2015-2016
93%
2015-2016
100%
2013-2014
100%
2013-2014
93%
2018
33%
2017
33%
2017
100%
2016
100%
2016
82%
2015
82%
2015
100%
2014
100%
2014
85%
2013
85%
2013
80%
2015
40%
2013
100%
2013
100%
2013
70%
2013
40%
2013
70%
2013
59%
2017-2018
59%
2017-2018
58%
2015-2016
58%
2015-2016
58%
2015-2016
58%
2015-2016
60%
2015
60%
2015
65%
2014
65%
2014
65%
2014
65%
2014
58%
2013-2014
58%
2013-2014
58%
2013-2014
58%
2013-2014
70%
2013
70%
2013
100%
2017
100%
2017
83%
2016
83%
2016
76%
2015
76%
2015
76%
2014
76%
2014
67%
2013
67%
2013
95%
2015-2016
93%
2013-2014
79%
2016
81%
2015
79%
2013
78%
2018
98%
2017
81%
2017
84%
2016
76%
2016
74%
2015
74%
2015
74%
2014
66%
2014
81%
2013
81%
2013
82%
2015-2016
86%
2012-2013
0%
2015-2016
0%
2015-2016
0%
2013-2014
0%
2013-2014
31%
2013-2014
31%
2013-2014
20%
2013
50%
2015-2016
50%
2015-2016
11%
2014
11%
2014
10%
2013-2014
10%
2013-2014
2%
2012
2%
2012
arrow_upward