Card image cap

Jim Costa's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Environment

Office:

On The Ballot: Running, Democratic for U.S. House (CA) - District 21

Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issue concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

With rare exceptions, Vote Smart displays interest group ratings as a 0-100 percentage. While many interest groups use percentages as ratings to begin with, please note that Vote Smart has translated some ratings to a percentage from a different rating system for consistency and ease in understanding. Please visit the group's website, email us at ratings@votesmart.org or call our Voter Information Hotline at 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

80%
2015-2016
100%
2013-2014
100%
2011-2012
66%
2007-2008
58%
2005-2006
22%
2005-2006
22%
2005-2006
100
2007
89%
2019-2020
89%
2019-2020
58%
2017-2018
58%
2017-2018
33%
2015-2016
33%
2015-2016
21%
2013-2014
21%
2013-2014
27%
2011-2012
27%
2011-2012
33%
2011
67%
2022
53%
2015-2016
53%
2015-2016
60%
2015
40%
2014
0%
2013
22%
2011-2012
22%
2011-2012
36%
2011
87%
2009
92%
2008
100%
2020
100%
2020
66%
2018
60%
2017
50%
2015-2016
50%
2015-2016
50%
2015
56%
2014
56%
2013-2014
56%
2013-2014
69%
2013
64%
2011-2012
64%
2011-2012
57%
2006-2012
57%
2006-2012
92%
2023
89%
2022
57%
2022
56%
2021
96%
2021
100%
2020
54%
2020
88%
2019-2020
79%
2019
51%
2019
49%
2018
69%
2018
50%
2017-2018
31%
2017
47%
2017
55%
2016
48%
2016
49%
2015-2016
48%
2014
35%
2013-2014
51%
2013
36%
2013
54%
2012
40%
2012
36%
2011-2012
57%
2011
31%
2011
68%
2010
80%
2010
75%
2009-2010
71%
2009
76%
2007-2008
75%
2007
42%
2006
61%
2005
75%
2005
arrow_upward