Card image cap

Jim Costa's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Arts, Entertainment, and History

Office:

On The Ballot: Running, Democratic for U.S. House (CA) - District 21

Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issue concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

With rare exceptions, Vote Smart displays interest group ratings as a 0-100 percentage. While many interest groups use percentages as ratings to begin with, please note that Vote Smart has translated some ratings to a percentage from a different rating system for consistency and ease in understanding. Please visit the group's website, email us at ratings@votesmart.org or call our Voter Information Hotline at 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

58%
2013
58%
2013
55%
2013
55%
2013
44%
2013
44%
2013
43%
2013
43%
2013
42%
2013
42%
2013
57%
2013
57%
2013
43%
2013
43%
2013
37%
2012
37%
2012
58%
2012
58%
2012
60%
2012
60%
2012
58%
2012
58%
2012
42%
2012
42%
2012
41%
2012
41%
2012
42%
2012
42%
2012
62%
2012
62%
2012
40%
2011
40%
2011
60%
2011
60%
2011
59%
2011
59%
2011
43%
2011
43%
2011
59%
2011
59%
2011
41%
2011
41%
2011
57%
2011
57%
2011
41%
2011
41%
2011
56%
2010
56%
2010
50%
2010
50%
2010
38%
2010
38%
2010
53%
2010
53%
2010
49%
2010
49%
2010
47%
2010
47%
2010
50%
2010
50%
2010
49%
2010
49%
2010
55%
2009
55%
2009
46%
2009
46%
2009
54%
2009
54%
2009
52%
2009
52%
2009
45%
2009
45%
2009
48%
2009
48%
2009
44%
2009
44%
2009
53%
2009
53%
2009
51%
2008
51%
2008
48%
2008
48%
2008
50%
2008
50%
2008
48%
2008
48%
2008
54%
2008
54%
2008
42%
2008
42%
2008
47.2%
2008
47.2%
2008
53%
2008
53%
2008
59%
2007
59%
2007
41%
2007
41%
2007
59.5%
2007
59.5%
2007
60%
2007
60%
2007
40%
2007
40%
2007
40.5%
2007
40.5%
2007
59%
2007
59%
2007
40%
2007
40%
2007
43%
2006
43%
2006
57%
2006
57%
2006
62%
2006
62%
2006
41%
2006
41%
2006
38%
2006
38%
2006
58%
2006
58%
2006
59.2%
2006
59.2%
2006
40.8%
2006
40.8%
2006
41%
2005
41%
2005
59%
2005
59%
2005
41%
2005
41%
2005
41%
2005
41%
2005
60%
2005
60%
2005
60%
2005
60%
2005
39%
2005
39%
2005
59%
2005
59%
2005
75%
2017-2018
arrow_upward