Card image cap

Lou Lang's Ratings and Endorsements

Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issue concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

With rare exceptions, Vote Smart displays interest group ratings as a 0-100 percentage. While many interest groups use percentages as ratings to begin with, please note that Vote Smart has translated some ratings to a percentage from a different rating system for consistency and ease in understanding. Please visit the group's website, email us at ratings@votesmart.org or call our Voter Information Hotline at 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

42%
2015-2016
50%
2013-2016
56%
2013-2014
58%
2013-2014
53%
2011-2012
50%
2009-2010
9%
2007-2008
44%
2005-2006
36%
2003-2004
21%
2002
59%
2001-2002
60%
1996
69%
2009-2010
86
2008
77%
2005-2006
79%
2003-2004
95%
2003-2008
95%
2003-2008
100%
2003-2006
100%
2003-2006
100%
2003-2005
100%
2003-2005
100%
2003-2004
100%
2003-2004
100%
2018
100%
2018
90%
2018
90%
2018
98%
2016-2017
98%
2016-2017
89%
2016-2017
89%
2016-2017
88%
2015
88%
2015
74%
2015
74%
2015
89%
2014
89%
2014
97%
2014
97%
2014
75%
2013
75%
2013
88%
2013
88%
2013
89%
2012
89%
2012
47%
2012
47%
2012
65%
2011
65%
2011
92%
2011
92%
2011
97%
2010
97%
2010
97%
2009
97%
2009
95%
2009
95%
2009
100
2007
100
2007
95%
2005
95%
2005
100%
2004
100%
2004
100%
2003
100%
2003
100%
2001
100%
2001
95%
1999
95%
1999
100%
1997
100%
1997
88%
2016
100%
2015
87%
2015
86%
2014
83%
2014
67%
2013
88%
2012
73
2012
90%
2011
78%
2011
92%
2010
89%
2009-2010
89%
2009-2010
100
2008
100
2007
83%
2003
0%
2001
10%
2011
arrow_upward