Vote Smart - Facts For All

Ron Kind's Issue Positions (Political Courage Test)

Key

Official Position: Candidate addressed this issue directly by taking the Political Courage Test.

Inferred Position: Candidate refused to address this issue, but Vote Smart inferred this issue based on the candidate's public record, including statements, voting record, and special interest group endorsements.

Unknown Position: Candidate refused to address this issue, or we could not infer an answer for this candidate despite exhaustive research of their public record.

Additional Information: Click on this icon to reveal more information about this candidate's position, from their answers or Vote Smart's research.

Other or Expanded Principles & Legislative Priorities are entered exactly as candidates submit them. Vote Smart does not edit for misspelled words, punctuation or grammar.

What else does Kind say?

Ron Kind has failed to provide voters with positions on key issues covered by the 2020 Political Courage Test, despite repeated requests from Vote Smart and voters like you.

What is the Political Courage Test?

Issue Positions

For Presidential and Congressional candidates who refuse to provide voters with their positions, Vote Smart has researched their public records to determine their likely responses. These issue positions are from 2020.

Pro-choice

Abortion: Do you generally support pro-choice or pro-life legislation?

Pro-choice

Rated 100% by Planned Parenthood. (votesmart.org)
Signed a letter stating: "Many people are fearful about how your presidency will affect women and girls. You have promised to nominate Supreme Court Justices who will overturn Roe v. Wade. You have also nominated officials with unabashedly anti-woman records to serve in cabinet posts with power to affect women's health and day-to-day lives. Because of their fears about what lies ahead, women are already taking action to protect themselves against possible negative outcomes, such as by rushing to their doctors to obtain long-acting birth control before your inauguration." (votesmart.org)
Signed a letter stating: "Women have the right to make their own decisions about their reproductive health." (votesmart.org)
"Today #SCOTUS reaffirmed a womanâs constitutional right to make her own health care choices. #StopTheSham" (twitter.com)

Yes

Budget: In order to balance the budget, do you support an income tax increase on any tax bracket?

Yes

"Who loses under the #GOPtaxbill? Middle-class Wisconsin families - while the wealthiest Americans and corporations get a tax break." (twitter.com)
"Adding almost $2 trillion in debt to pay for tax cuts for the wealthy and powerful isn't tax reform, it's a giveaway to those who need it least." (www.facebook.com)
"#GOPTaxPlan sticks our children and grandchildren with $1.7 Trillion in debt while giving tax breaks to powerful special interests and the wealthy." (twitter.com)
"Their proposal cuts taxes for powerful special interests while sticking our children and grandchildren with the bill." (votesmart.org)

Yes

Budget: Do you support expanding federal funding to support entitlement programs such as Social Security and Medicare?

Yes

"I know how important Medicare and Social Security are to you -- they're important to my family too. We need to strengthen modernize these programs for next generation. Click here to sign your name if you agree we need to preserve Social Security for hard-working Americans, not privatize it." (votesmart.org)
"Just voted against the #taxbill. This bill will increase taxes on millions of Americans, add $2 trillion in debt and put future of Social Security and Medicare at risk. Bad for Wisconsinites!" (twitter.com)
"The Medicare you depend on will be financially secure. Health insurance reform protects and strengthens the Medicare benefits promised to senior citizens." (votesmart.org)
"This Administration's request to cut $845 billion from Medicare and $241 billion from Medicaid won't fly. The care that Wisconsin's seniors and families rely on won't be a bargaining chip on the table. This is totally unacceptable." (twitter.com)

Yes

Campaign Finance: Do you support the regulation of indirect campaign contributions from corporations and unions?

Yes

"10 years ago today, the Supreme Court made the disastrous decision of allowing dark money to influence our elections with its ruling in Citizens United v. FEC." (twitter.com)
"I am proud to cosponsor the For the People Act, a bill that puts the power back where it belongs: in the hands of Wisconsinites. #HR1" (twitter.com)
"On the heels of the disastrous Citizens United decision, today's misguided ruling further illustrates the need for Congress to step in and restore some balance to our political process so that the voices of the people can be heard. That's why I'm fighting to pass comprehensive campaign finance reform legislation called the "Government by the People Act' that would reduce the influence of big money in politics, and make this a government of, by, and for the people." (votesmart.org)
Rated 87% by Common Cause. (votesmart.org)

Unknown Position

Crime: Do you support the protection of government officials, including law enforcement officers, from personal liability in civil lawsuits concerning alleged misconduct?

Unknown Position

Voted in favor of HR 7120 - George Floyd Justice in Policing Act of 2020. (votesmart.org)
"We must implement common sense reforms that ensure equality and justice for all Americans, and I encourage leaders on all sides not to turn this tragedy into another partisan fight. Rest assured I will continue to stand with our peaceful protesters who are once again demanding the change our country so badly needs." (www.facebook.com)

Defense: Do you support increasing defense spending?

Rated 5% by Center for Security Policy. (votesmart.org)
"The Pentagon's brazen misuse of hardworking Wisconsinites' tax dollars is unacceptable, and should be remedied immediately," said Rep. Ron Kind. "The Defense Department needs to act quickly to create more transparency and efficiency within the department," (votesmart.org)
"Today, U.S. Rep. Ron Kind introduced the Wasteful Defense Spending Reduction Act, a bipartisan bill that creates an expedited process to cut wasteful defense spending and pay down the national debt." (votesmart.org)

Yes

Economy: Do you support federal spending as a means of promoting economic growth?

Yes

"Proud to join the brand new Task Force on #RuralBroadband today! Together, this task force will make sure weâre spending federal funding for rural broadband effectively and ensuring affordable universal internet access by 2025." (twitter.com)
Signed a letter stating: "Failure to adequately fund the Highway Trust fund would affect hundreds of thousands of American jobs and severely impact the flow of commerce in our country. It is the responsibility of this Committee to ensure that the Highway Trust Fund is adequate to meet our critical infrastructure needs." (votesmart.org)
Signed a letter stating: "We need reliable funding sources for infrastructure that cannot be looted for other projects. Americans are ready for innovations in financing, including responsible public-private partnerships." (votesmart.org)

Economy: Do you support lowering corporate taxes as a means of promoting economic growth?

Signed a letter stating: "We urge you to vote no on H.J. Resolution 54, a Republican proposal to repeal Treasury's finalized debt-equity regulations issued under Section 385 of the tax code. These regulations are intended to combat aggressive corporate tax planning techniques that, rather than serving an economic purpose, are used by some corporations to avoid taxes." (votesmart.org)
"Tariffs are taxes on Wisconsinites. We need to work together with our allies to find solutions that benefit Wisconsin workers, farmers and families instead of harming them." (twitter.com)
"Who loses under the #GOPtaxbill? Middle-class Wisconsin families - while the wealthiest Americans and corporations get a tax break." (twitter.com)
"Wisconsinites know that sticking to a budget is about discipline & priorities. Meanwhile, leaders of both parties have passed reckless tax cuts for billionaires & bills that aren't paid for, causing the deficit to balloon. It's irresponsible, unacceptable, & must stop." (twitter.com)

Yes

Economy: Do you support providing financial relief to businesses AND/OR corporations negatively impacted by the state of national emergency for COVID-19?

Yes

"Our country is currently facing a serious health emergency, and with it an economic emergency. Today we took another important step toward getting businesses, working families, and health care providers the support they need during these tough times," said Rep. Ron Kind. "I'm glad Congress could put our differences aside and work with the Administration to provide immediate financial support for many Wisconsinites, increase unemployment insurance benefits for those out of work, support Wisconsin businesses through this challenging time, and ensure hospitals have the resources they need to combat COVID-19 in a safe way." (votesmart.org)

Yes

Education: Do you support requiring states to adopt federal education standards?

Yes

"After years of waiting for a replacement for No Child Left Behind, I am pleased that we were able to craft a bipartisan piece of legislation that gives our teachers the flexibility to adequately address each student's needs, rather than tying their hands with a one-size-fits-all approach," (votesmart.org)
Rated 100% by the National Education Association. (votesmart.org)

Yes

Energy and Environment: Do you support government funding for the development of renewable energy (e.g. solar, wind, geo-thermal)?

Yes

Rated 0% by American Energy Alliance. (votesmart.org)
"We need to make sure Wisconsin workers have the training they need to compete for these jobs, which is why I co-sponsored legislation to train our workers for jobs in renewable and energy efficiency industries," Rep. Kind stated." (votesmart.org)

Yes

Energy and Environment: Do you support the federal regulation of greenhouse gas emissions?

Yes

"I am proud to support the Climate Action Now Act, and reaffirm our National commitment to work with our global allies to combat climate change. #ClimateActionNow" (twitter.com)
Rated 97% by League of Conservation Voters (justfacts.votesmart.org)
Signed a letter stating: "Mitigation of climate change is a national priority that requires national policies to reduce our greenhouse gas emissions, like producing significantly more energy from clean and carbon free souces as a means of achieving the polution reduction pledge the U.S. made ahead of COP21." (www.foreign.senate.gov)
"Wisconsinites are blessed to live in one of the most beautiful places in our country. It's up to us to ensure our environment is protected for generations to come. I am proud to support the Climate Action Now Act, and reaffirm our National commitment to work with our global allies to combat climate change," said Rep. Ron Kind." (votesmart.org)

Guns: Do you generally support gun-control legislation?

"As an avid sportsman, I have long supported the Second Amendment and the rights of gun owners. It is vital that we protect these traditions not only for hunters but for our children as well - so future generations can also enjoy everything our great outdoors have to offer." (votesmart.org)
"More great discussions about the spread of CWD, the threat of gun violence in our schools and churches, and rebuilding our failing river infrastructure." (twitter.com)
"Taking action on gun violence and being respectful about Second Amendment rights are not mutually exclusive. Only by working together on this can we prevent these mass shootings from happening." (twitter.com)
"Today, we remember the lives lost in the horrific Parkland shooting. Gun violence cannot be our new normal. It's time to move forward on commonsense gun safety measures in this new Congress, and protect our children and families." (twitter.com)

Health Care: Do you support repealing the 2010 Affordable Care Act ("Obamacare")?

"For the 141,000 WI residents who have health care because of ACA, we need to improve #ACA not repeal it. #ACARepeal" (twitter.com)
"Providing affordable and quality health care has been one of my goals since I was elected. That's why I'm proud that the Affordable Care Act has helped more people receive access to health care while driving down costs throughout the country." (www.ronkind.org)
"The ACA is still the law of the land, and Iâm still fighting to protect Wisconsinitesâ access to healthcare - even if you live with a pre-existing condition. Next year, weâll work together to improve the affordability & accessibility of healthcare in WI." (twitter.com)
Voted in favor of HR 986 - Protecting Americans with Preexisting Conditions Act of 2019. (votesmart.org)

Yes

Health Care: Do you support requiring businesses to provide paid medical leave during public health crises, such as COVID-19?

Yes

Voted in favor of HR 6201 - Families First Coronavirus Response Act. (votesmart.org)

Immigration: Do you support the construction of a wall along the Mexican border?

"Unlike the president's request for a $5.7 Billion border wall funded by Wisconsin taxpayer dollars, Rep. Kind's plan would raise $24 Billion for border security by fining immigrants living in America without proper documentation or with expired visas. It would also create a path to citizenship for the estimated 12 million immigrants living in America illegally, in-turn growing the labor force and creating a sustainable new source of tax revenue." (votesmart.org)

Immigration: Do you support requiring immigrants who are unlawfully present to return to their country of origin before they are eligible for citizenship?

"Itâs time we create a pathway to citizenship that funds border modernization and stops the inflow of drugs into our country, while promoting the legal immigration that Wisconsinâs farmers, businesses and communities need." (twitter.com)
"No question that our immigration system is broken & in need of repair, but separating families is wrong. It has never been the policy of our Nation to use children as political pawns. I am proud to support the #KeepFamiliesTogetherAct to stop this practice & reunite families." (twitter.com)
Signed a letter stating "While we work towards the goal of comprehensive immigration reform in Congress, we encourage you to exercise your authority to provide relief to millions of families from unnecessary detention and deportation." (delbene.house.gov)
"Unlike the president's request for a $5.7 Billion border wall funded by Wisconsin taxpayer dollars, Rep. Kind's plan would raise $24 Billion for border security by fining immigrants living in America without proper documentation or with expired visas. It would also create a path to citizenship for the estimated 12 million immigrants living in America illegally, in-turn growing the labor force and creating a sustainable new source of tax revenue." (votesmart.org)

Unknown Position

National Security: Should the United States use military force to prevent governments hostile to the U.S. from possessing a weapon of mass destruction (for example: nuclear, biological, chemical)?

Unknown Position

"He reminds us of the importance of maintaining the Iran Nuclear Agreement." (twitter.com)
Rated 5% by Center for Security Policy. (votesmart.org)
"The President's decision to unilaterally withdraw the United States from the Iran Nuclear Agreement jeopardizes our national security and can ignite a nuclear arms race in the Middle East." (votesmart.org)
"This agreement gives us the best opportunity to avoid military action and may accomplish our ultimate objective: to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon, protecting the security of our allies in the region, and avoiding a nuclear arms race in the Middle East." (votesmart.org)

Yes

National Security: Do you support reducing military intervention in Middle East conflicts?

Yes

Rated 5% by Center for Security Policy. (votesmart.org)
"For more than a decade, our troops have served in Iraq and continue to serve in Afghanistan, our longest conflict in U.S. history. The death of Osama bin Laden, who had declared war on America and was directly responsible for the deaths of thousands of Americans, was a major accomplishment for our armed forces and intelligence services. And because of this, I believe President Obama's announced strategy for troop withdrawal is a step in the right direction." (votesmart.org)
"It is time to take the training wheels off in Afghanistan. I am hopeful that the President's strategy will both safely allow Afghanistan to take responsibility for their security, economic reconstruction and self-governance -- and get our troops home safe and sound." (votesmart.org)

Yes

Trade: Do you generally support removing barriers to international trade (for example: tariffs, quotas, etc.)?

Yes

Signed a letter stating: "We look forward to additional consultations with you as we continue to review all aspects of the USMCA. In the meantime, however, we urge you to put the highest priority on lifting the steel and aluminum tariffs and retaliation entirely as soon as possible, and certainly before congressional consideration." (votesmart.org)
"Tariffs are taxes on WI's farmers, workers, & families, & thatâs exactly who is going to feel it after this escalation." (twitter.com)
"We need to end the trade war and lift the tariffs that are hurting our family farmers. Read more about my recent roundtable with Wisconsin farmers and agriculture leaders here:" (twitter.com)
"With 95% of the world's population living outside our borders, if the United States is going to compete in the 21st century global economy, we cannot shy away from opportunities to guide and expand global trade." (votesmart.org)

This candidate has responded to a Political Courage Test in a previous election. As a continued effort to provide the American public with factual information on candidates running for public office, these archived responses are made available here.

Wisconsin Congressional Election 2012 Political Courage Test

Abortion

Pro-choice		Do you generally support pro-choice or pro-life legislation?
I am pro-choice and support the United States Supreme Court decision in Roe v. Wade, which protects a woman's right to choose. I believe that abortions should be rare and safe, and that it should be a decision made between a woman, her family and her doctor, based on her own personal beliefs and faith. Furthermore, I believe that all of us must do more to reduce the number of unwanted pregnancies, particularly teenage pregnancies, as well as support efforts to make adoption more widely available.

Afghanistan

Yes		Do you support United States' combat operations in Afghanistan?
Yes		Do you support a timetable for withdrawal from Afghanistan?
Afghanistan must take responsibility for its security, economic reconstruction and self governance so we can get our troops home safe and sound. As we draw down American troops, we must work with the Afghani and Pakistani people to ensure that al Qaeda no longer enjoys safe havens to plot their next attack.

Budget

Indicate which proposals you support (if any) for balancing the federal budget.In order to balance the budget,

Yes		do you support reducing defense spending?
Yes		do you support an income tax increase on any tax bracket?
Yes		do you support reducing Medicaid spending?
Yes		do you support reducing Medicare spending?
Yes		Is balancing the budget a legislative priority?
I support a balanced plan to address our budget deficits. Both sides need to compromise to put on a more fiscally sustainable path. That means making spending cuts but also asking powerful special interests to contribute their fair share by eliminating tax loopholes. We can also save money in Medicare and Medicaid and improve the quality of care by building on health care reform efforts that are transforming our system into one that delivers higher quality care at a lower cost and eliminates waste in the system. We can do that without reducing any benefits for seniors.

Campaign Finance

Yes		Do you support the regulation of indirect campaign contributions from corporations and unions?
I believe that the American people have a right to know who is spending what to influence elections. I support increasing disclosure and strengthening transparency in federal campaigns.

Capital Punishment

Yes

Do you support capital punishment for certain crimes?

Economy

Yes		Do you support federal spending as a means of promoting economic growth?
Yes		Do you support providing tax incentives to businesses for the purpose of job creation?
Yes		Do you support spending on infrastructure projects for the purpose of job creation?
Yes		Do you support the temporary extension of unemployment benefits?
No		Do you support the 2010 temporary extension of tax relief?
I opposed efforts in 2010 to irresponsibly increase the deficit by extending tax relief beyond working families and small businesses to the wealthiest two percent of taxpayers who need them the least. Without finding spending cuts in the budget to pay for cuts for millionaires, the 2010 tax relief legislation added almost $1 trillion to the deficit. We cannot afford to borrow billions of dollars and add to the debt of our children and grandchildren. For those calling for the extension of tax relief for wealthy Wall Street bankers, they should find corresponding spending cuts to pay for them.

Education

Yes		Do you support requiring states to implement education reforms in order to be eligible for competitive federal grants?
I support the Administration's Race to the Top Initiative that requires education reforms to be eligible for competitive grants. Not all federal grants should be subject to such requirements but Race to the Top had an important role to play in spurring innovation to improve our schools.

Energy

No		Do you support reducing restrictions on offshore energy production?
Ronald Kind. House to Act on Comprehensive Energy Legislation New Week. 12 September 2008. "I heard over and over from the families and businesses I visited that we need a comprehensive energy strategy, and this bill represents that strategy. It has it all: tremendous investments in renewable energy, increased domestic supply, and greater conservation. It will move us toward greater energy independence, and I look forward to supporting this historic legislation next week." (votesmart.org) Ronald Kind. House backs offshore drilling: Foes say plan does little to boost energy supplies. 17 September 2008. "Rep. Ron Kind, a La Crosse Democrat who has broken with his party to vote for offshore drilling in the past, said the alternative energy provisions in the House bill hold the most promise for the country. 'We can't drill our way out of this situation. The whole 'Drill, drill, drill' chant misses the mark,' Kind said. Noting that the country consumes about 25% of the oil being produced in the world but holds only about 3% of the globe's known reserves, he said, 'Our national chant needs to be 'Invent, invent, invent.'" (www.jsonline.com) Ronald Kind. Project Vote Smart: 2012 Wisconsin Congressional Political Courage Test. Selected NO ANSWER for: "Do you support reducing restrictions on offshore energy production?" Energy other or expanded principles: "I am willing to support further development of offshore energy production, but the Deepwater Horizon oil spill has clearly shown that we must be very careful in ensuring that we have meaningful oversight to protect the safety of our workers, while minimizing the risk of environmentally destroying our waters." Ronald Kind. Issue Position: Energy. 20 September 2011. "I have always favored an all of the above energy strategy that includes responsible domestic offshore energy development and increased investment in renewable energy [¦] A "drill only" policy will not make us energy independent. The United States consumes 25% of the world's oil, yet we only have 1.6% of the world's proven oil reserves. Oil extracted from these reserves won't be available at the pump for at least 10 years. And, despite the BP oil spill, domestic oil production last year was at the highest level since 2003 - higher than during most of the Bush Administration. This increased domestic production was not enough to protect us from this spike in gas prices. " (votesmart.org) Ron Kind. Project Vote Smart: 2004 Wisconsin Congressional Political Courage Test. Did Not Check SUPPORT for: "f) Support increased development of traditional energy resources (e.g. coal, natural gas, oil)." Environment America. 04/18/2012. "Ron Kind supported the interests of Environment America 100 percent in 2009." (votesmart.org) Ron Kind. H Amdt 773. 112th Congress. Ending Moratorium on Deepwater Drilling Rigs that Meet Certain Safety Standards. Ron Kind voted Yea on 07/30/2010. (votesmart.org) Ron Kind. HR 1230. 112th Congress. Offshore Leasing Act. Ron Kind voted Nay on 05/05/2011. (votesmart.org) Ron Kind. HR 3534. 112th Congress. Offshore Drilling Regulations and Other Energy Law Amendments. Ron Kind voted Yea on 07/30/2010. (votesmart.org) Ronald Kind. Kind: Offshore drilling unlikely. 16 July 2008. "Kind says oil companies already have access to millions of acres of land where they can drill for oil, but they aren't. He wants Congress to enact "use it or lose it" legislation. The measure would require companies to act on the nearly 4,000 leases they control, or lose them." (www.wrn.com) Ron Kind. Project Vote Smart: 2004 Wisconsin Congressional Political Courage Test. Did Not Check SUPPORT for: "h) Support opening a select portion of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge for oil exploration."
I am willing to support further development of offshore energy production, but the Deepwater Horizon oil spill has clearly shown that we must be very careful in ensuring that we have meaningful oversight to protect the safety of our workers, while minimizing the risk of environmentally destroying our waters.

Environment

Yes		Do you believe that human activity is contributing to climate change?
Yes		Do you support the federal regulation of greenhouse gas emissions?
"U.S. Rep. Ron Kind (D-WI) today joined a majority in the House in passing a comprehensive renewable energy bill, the Energy Independence and Security Act, designed to reduce America's dependence on foreign oil, lower energy costs, create new jobs, and begin to address global climate change. The bill overall will reduce greenhouse gas emissions by up to 35 percent of what is needed by 2030 to significantly combat global warming." http://kind.house.gov/latest-news/rep-kind-study-on-biofuels-included-in-house-passed-energy-bill/ (kind.house.gov) Signed a letter stating: "Mitigation of climate change is a national priority that requires national policies to reduce our greenhouse gas emissions, like producing significantly more energy from clean and carbon free souces as a means of achieving the polution reduction pledge the U.S. made ahead of COP21." https://www.foreign.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/4-21-16%20Bicam%20Support%20for%20PA%20Letter%20to%20POTUS%20BLC-JKD.pdf (www.foreign.senate.gov) Signed a letter stating: "Mitigation of climate change is a national priority that requires national policies to reduce our greenhouse gas emissions, like producing significantly more energy from clean and carbon free souces as a means of achieving the polution reduction pledge the U.S. made ahead of COP21." https://www.foreign.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/4-21-16%20Bicam%20Support%20for%20PA%20Letter%20to%20POTUS%20BLC-JKD.pdf (www.foreign.senate.gov) Signed a letter stating: "Mitigation of climate change is a national priority that requires national policies to reduce our greenhouse gas emissions, like producing significantly more energy from clean and carbon free souces as a means of achieving the polution reduction pledge the U.S. made ahead of COP21." https://www.foreign.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/4-21-16%20Bicam%20Support%20for%20PA%20Letter%20to%20POTUS%20BLC-JKD.pdf (www.foreign.senate.gov) "I am proud to support the Climate Action Now Act, and reaffirm our National commitment to work with our global allies to combat climate change. #ClimateActionNow" https://twitter.com/RepRonKind/status/1124022821687037958 (twitter.com) Rated 97% by League of Conservation Voters https://justfacts.votesmart.org/candidate/evaluations/630/ron-kind#collapse21 (justfacts.votesmart.org) Signed a letter stating: "Mitigation of climate change is a national priority that requires national policies to reduce our greenhouse gas emissions, like producing significantly more energy from clean and carbon free souces as a means of achieving the polution reduction pledge the U.S. made ahead of COP21." https://www.foreign.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/4-21-16%20Bicam%20Support%20for%20PA%20Letter%20to%20POTUS%20BLC-JKD.pdf (www.foreign.senate.gov) "Wisconsinites are blessed to live in one of the most beautiful places in our country. It's up to us to ensure our environment is protected for generations to come. I am proud to support the Climate Action Now Act, and reaffirm our National commitment to work with our global allies to combat climate change," said Rep. Ron Kind." https://votesmart.org/public-statement/1340039/rep-ron-kind-votes-to-protect-wisconsins-environment-and-stay-in-paris-climate-agreement (votesmart.org) Ronald Kind. Energy Tax Prevention Act of 2011. 6 April 2011. "I urge my colleagues to support this amendment because it is a commonsense solution that accepts the scientific evidence that greenhouse gases are dangerous to human health, and it enacts a workable solution that will protect human health and that will ensure clean air while shielding the vast majority of sources from any regulatory requirements." (votesmart.org) Ronald Kind. Renewable Energy and Job Creation Act of 2008. 21 May 2008. "The qualified energy conservation bonds give states and local governments the resources needed to invest in green programs designed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Giving local authorities the power to choose what green energies to implement in their backyard is good public policy, because I know the energy needs of western Wisconsin are vastly different than those of Queens." (votesmart.org) Ronald Kind. Project Vote Smart: 2012 Wisconsin Congressional Political Courage Test. Selected NO ANSWER for: "Do you support the federal regulation of greenhouse gas emissions?" Envioronment other or expanded principles: "I am wary of a one-size-fits-all approach to the federal regulation of greenhouse gases. Given the difficult regional and national issues that this involves, I have long believed that it is more desirable for Congress to issue further guidance before the EPA singlehandedly begins to regulate these issues." Ron Kind. Project Vote Smart: 1996 Wisconsin Congressional Political Courage Test. Did Not Check SUPPORT for: "l) Promote the selling of pollution credits to encourage industries to decrease amount of pollution." Ron Kind. Project Vote Smart: 1998 Wisconsin Congressional Political Courage Test. Checked SUPPORT for: "i) Promote the selling of pollution credits between nations to encourage industries to decrease pollution levels." Indicate which principles you support (if any) regarding America's environment and natural resources. Other or expanded principles: "Protect Health of the Upper Mississippi River." Ron Kind. Project Vote Smart: 2000 Wisconsin Congressional Political Courage Test. Checked SUPPORT for: "b) Strengthen the regulation and enforcement of the Clean Air Act." Ron Kind. Project Vote Smart: 1998 Wisconsin Congressional Political Courage Test. Did Not Check SUPPORT for: "k) Adhere to the United Nations treaty regarding global climate change." Ron Kind. Project Vote Smart: 2004 Wisconsin Congressional Political Courage Test. Checked SUPPORT for: "k) Allow energy producers to trade pollution credits." Ron Kind. Project Vote Smart: 2000 Wisconsin Congressional Political Courage Test. Checked SUPPORT for: "c) Reduce government regulation of the private sector in order to encourage investment and economic expansion." Ron Kind. Project Vote Smart: 1996 Wisconsin Congressional Political Courage Test. Did Not Check SUPPORT for: "i) Strengthen emission controls on all gasoline or diesel powered engines, including cars and trucks." Ron Kind. Project Vote Smart: 2000 Wisconsin Congressional Political Courage Test. Checked SUPPORT for: "h) Promote the selling of pollution credits between nations to encourage industries to decrease pollution levels." Ron Kind. Project Vote Smart: 1998 Wisconsin Congressional Political Courage Test. Checked SUPPORT for: "j) Impose stricter national air quality standards." Indicate which principles you support (if any) regarding America's environment and natural resources. Other or expanded principles: "Protect Health of the Upper Mississippi River." Ron Kind. Project Vote Smart: 1998 Wisconsin Congressional Political Courage Test. Did Not Check SUPPORT for: "g) Strengthen emission controls on all gasoline or diesel powered engines, including cars and trucks." Ron Kind. Project Vote Smart: 1996 Wisconsin Congressional Political Courage Test. Did Not Check SUPPORT for: "d) Eliminate government regulations of the private sector in order to encourage investment and economic expansion." Ron Kind. Project Vote Smart: 2004 Wisconsin Congressional Political Courage Test. Did Not Check SUPPORT for: "g) Strengthen emission controls and fuel efficiency standards on all gasoline and diesel-powered engines, including cars, trucks, and sport utility vehicles." Ron Kind. Project Vote Smart: 2004 Wisconsin Congressional Political Courage Test. Checked SUPPORT for: "l) Support the U.S. re-entering the Kyoto treaty process to limit global warming." Ron Kind. Project Vote Smart: 2000 Wisconsin Congressional Political Courage Test. Did Not Check SUPPORT for: "g) Strengthen emission controls on all gasoline or diesel-powered engines, including cars, trucks, and sport utility vehicles." Ron Kind. Project Vote Smart: 2000 Wisconsin Congressional Political Courage Test. Did Not Check SUPPORT for: "j) Reduce current federal regulations on the environment." Ron Kind. HR 910. 112th Congress. Energy Tax Prevention Act. Ron Kind voted Nay on 04/07/2011. (votesmart.org) Environment America. 04/18/2012. "Ron Kind supported the interests of Environment America 100 percent in 2009." (votesmart.org) Sierra Club. Project Vote Smart: Interest Group Endorsements. 04/18/2012. Sierra Club endorsed Ron Kind in the 2010 general election. (votesmart.org) League of Conservation Voters. 04/18/2012. "Ron Kind supported the interests of the League of Conservation Voters 90 percent in 2010." (votesmart.org) Sierra Club. Project Vote Smart: Interest Group Endorsements. 04/18/2012. Sierra Club endorsed Ron Kind in the 2004 general election. (votesmart.org) Sierra Club. Project Vote Smart: Interest Group Endorsements. 04/18/2012. Sierra Club endorsed Ron Kind in the 2002 general election. (votesmart.org) Sierra Club. Project Vote Smart: Interest Group Endorsements. 04/18/2012. Sierra Club endorsed Ron Kind in the 2006 general election. (votesmart.org) Ron Kind. HR 2454. 111th Congress. Energy and Environmental Law Amendments ("Cap and Trade"). Ron Kind voted Yea on 06/26/2009. (votesmart.org) Ronald Kind. Global Climate Change. 16 November 2004. "Even with their own agencies producing reports on global warming, the President on down has kind of pooh-poohed the findings. And in fact at one time the President commented on one of the global warming studies that came out of the EPA that it was just the work of a bunch of career bureaucrats, as if to discount the findings of that report. But the most recent one, just released in August, was signed off on by the agency heads of those departments, so it is a little more difficult then for the President, with these political appointees, to claim they are just a bunch of bureaucrats doing what bureaucrats supposedly do, in his eyes, and that is producing a bunch of invalid, nonscientific-based reports, when in fact the information out there is just to the contrary [¦] The Earth's environment and ecosystem is based on that ocean circulatory system that would be adversely affected if global warming continues at the pace that it currently is. It could potentially shut down, creating an environmental havoc that perhaps is only realized in the imagination of Hollywood producers right now in the movies they are starting to produce but which may not be that far off from reality. This too I think is a huge implication that we have to start studying more and taking seriously in the policy decisions that we face in the upcoming session of Congress." (votesmart.org) “The Tailoring Rule, itself, represents a compromise. Despite being court-ordered to regulate greenhouse gases, the EPA took into account our fragile economy, and proposed a narrow rule that would exempt the vast majority of stationary sources from any regulation. Through the rule, the EPA takes the appropriate approach to regulating greenhouse gases by only requiring very large, new and expanded emitters to seek permits. My friends on the other side of the aisle, however, believe that the EPA intends to go even further than the Tailoring Rule, and will ultimately implement a tax on energy just as China is beginning to today; but voting for this amendment will prevent the EPA from doing this.” http://votesmart.org/public-statement/600421/#.VZxPvXUVhHw (votesmart.org) “U.S. Rep. Ron Kind (D-WI) today joined a majority in the House in passing a comprehensive renewable energy bill, the Energy Independence and Security Act, designed to reduce America's dependence on foreign oil, lower energy costs, create new jobs, and begin to address global climate change. The bill overall will reduce greenhouse gas emissions by up to 35 percent of what is needed by 2030 to significantly combat global warming.” http://kind.house.gov/latest-news/rep-kind-study-on-biofuels-included-in-house-passed-energy-bill/ (kind.house.gov) "The Tailoring Rule, itself, represents a compromise. Despite being court-ordered to regulate greenhouse gases, the EPA took into account our fragile economy, and proposed a narrow rule that would exempt the vast majority of stationary sources from any regulation. Through the rule, the EPA takes the appropriate approach to regulating greenhouse gases by only requiring very large, new and expanded emitters to seek permits. My friends on the other side of the aisle, however, believe that the EPA intends to go even further than the Tailoring Rule, and will ultimately implement a tax on energy just as China is beginning to today; but voting for this amendment will prevent the EPA from doing this." http://votesmart.org/public-statement/600421/#.VZxPvXUVhHw (votesmart.org)
I am wary of a one-size-fits-all approach to the federal regulation of greenhouse gases. Given the difficult regional and national issues that this involves, I have long believed that it is more desirable for Congress to issue further guidance before the EPA singlehandedly begins to regulate these issues.

Guns

Unknown Position		Do you support restrictions on the purchase and possession of guns?
Ronald Kind. National Right-to-Carry Reciprocity Act of 2011. 18 November 2011. "I rise today in strong support of the National Right-to-Carry Reciprocity Act, H.R. 822. Not only am I a proud cosponsor of this legislation but I am also a firm and committed supporter of Second Amendment rights. This legislation will ensure further protection of this vital right by allowing law abiding citizens to carry concealed weapons across state lines." (votesmart.org) Ron Kind. Project Vote Smart: 2004 Wisconsin Congressional Political Courage Test. Did Not Check SUPPORT for: "e) Allow citizens to carry concealed guns." Ronald Kind. Project Vote Smart. 2012 Wisconsin Congressional Political Courage Test. Selected NO ANSWER for: "Do you support restrictions on the purchase and possession of guns?" Guns other or expanded principles "I support current law and do not believe that new restrictions on the purchase and possession of guns should be imposed. As someone who has enjoyed hunting and fishing in scenic western Wisconsin my whole life, I am opposed to any legislation that would prevent law-abiding citizens from owning a gun. As a former local prosecutor, however, I have dealt with the effects of gun violence first-hand, and as a father and a husband, I am convinced that firearms should not fall into the hands of convicted felons." Ron Kind. Project Vote Smart: 2004 Wisconsin Congressional Political Courage Test. Did Not Check SUPPORT for: "d) Repeal federal restrictions on the purchase and possession of guns." Ron Kind. Project Vote Smart: 2000 Wisconsin Congressional Political Courage Test. Did Not Check SUPPORT for: "c) Ease federal restrictions on the purchase and possession of guns." Ron Kind. Project Vote Smart: 1996 Wisconsin Congressional Political Courage Test. Did Not Check SUPPORT for: "e) Repeal all bans and measures that restrict law-abiding citizens from owning legally-obtained firearms." Ron Kind. Project Vote Smart: 1996 Wisconsin Congressional Political Courage Test. Did Not Check SUPPORT for: "c) Maintain all federal registration procedures and restrictions on possessing firearms." Ron Kind. Project Vote Smart: 2004 Wisconsin Congressional Political Courage Test. Did Not Check SUPPORT for: "a) Renew the ban on the sale or transfer of semi-automatic guns, except those used for hunting." Ron Kind. Project Vote Smart: 1998 Wisconsin Congressional Political Courage Test. Did Not Check SUPPORT for: "a) Ban the sale or transfer of all forms of semi-automatic weapons." Ron Kind. Project Vote Smart: 1996 Wisconsin Congressional Political Courage Test. Did Not Check SUPPORT for: "a) Expand the nationwide ban on the sale or transfer of assault weapons to include all forms of semi-automatic weapons." Ron Kind. Project Vote Smart: 1996 Wisconsin Congressional Political Courage Test. Did Not Check SUPPORT for: "d) Implement tighter restrictions on firearm sales in an effort to hinder terrorist groups from stockpiling weapon arsenals." Ron Kind. Project Vote Smart: 2000 Wisconsin Congressional Political Courage Test. Did Not Check SUPPORT for: "e) Allow citizens to carry concealed guns." Ron Kind. Project Vote Smart: 1998 Wisconsin Congressional Political Courage Test. Did Not Check SUPPORT for: "d) Ease federal restrictions on the purchase and possession of firearms." Ron Kind. Project Vote Smart: 1996 Wisconsin Congressional Political Courage Test. Did Not Check SUPPORT for: "b) Increase restrictions on the purchase and possession of firearms." Ron Kind. Project Vote Smart: 2000 Wisconsin Congressional Political Courage Test. Did Not Check SUPPORT for: "a) Ban the sale or transfer of semi-automatic guns, except those used for hunting." Ron Kind. Project Vote Smart: 2000 Wisconsin Congressional Political Courage Test. Checked SUPPORT for: "b) Maintain and strengthen the enforcement of existing federal restrictions on the purchase and possession of guns." Ron Kind. Project Vote Smart: 2004 Wisconsin Congressional Political Courage Test. Did Not Check SUPPORT for: "c) Ease federal restrictions on the purchase and possession of guns." Ron Kind. Project Vote Smart: 1998 Wisconsin Congressional Political Courage Test. Did Not Check SUPPORT for: "f) Favor allowing citizens to carry concealed firearms." Ron Kind. Project Vote Smart: 2004 Wisconsin Congressional Political Courage Test. Did Not Check SUPPORT for: "h) Require a license for gun possession." Ron Kind. Project Vote Smart: 2000 Wisconsin Congressional Political Courage Test. Checked SUPPORT for: "f) Require manufacturers to provide child-safety locks on guns." Ron Kind. Project Vote Smart: 2000 Wisconsin Congressional Political Courage Test. Did Not Check SUPPORT for: "d) Repeal federal restrictions on the purchase and possession of guns." Ron Kind. Project Vote Smart: 2004 Wisconsin Congressional Political Courage Test. Checked SUPPORT for: "b) Maintain and strengthen the current level of enforcement of existing federal restrictions on the purchase and possession of guns." Ron Kind. Project Vote Smart: 1996 Wisconsin Congressional Political Courage Test. Did Not Check SUPPORT for: "f) Allow law-abiding citizens to carry concealed firearms that are legally owned and registered." Ron Kind. Project Vote Smart: 1998 Wisconsin Congressional Political Courage Test. Did Not Check SUPPORT for: "b) Increase federal restrictions on the purchase and possession of firearms." Ron Kind. Project Vote Smart: 2004 Wisconsin Congressional Political Courage Test. Did Not Check SUPPORT for: "g) Require background checks on gun sales between private citizens at gun shows." Ron Kind. Project Vote Smart: 1998 Wisconsin Congressional Political Courage Test. Did Not Check SUPPORT for: "e) Repeal federal restrictions on the purchase and possession of firearms by law-abiding citizens." Ron Kind. Project Vote Smart: 2000 Wisconsin Congressional Political Courage Test. Checked SUPPORT for: "j) Require background checks of gun buyers at gun shows." Ron Kind. Project Vote Smart: 2000 Wisconsin Congressional Political Courage Test. Did Not Check SUPPORT for: "i) Raise the minimum age for ownership of handguns from 18 to 21." Ron Kind. Project Vote Smart: 1998 Wisconsin Congressional Political Courage Test. Checked SUPPORT for: "c) Maintain federal restrictions on the purchase and possession of firearms." Ron Kind. Project Vote Smart: 1996 Wisconsin Congressional Political Courage Test. Did Not Check SUPPORT for: "d) Ease procedures on the purchase and registration of firearms." Ron Kind. Project Vote Smart: 2000 Wisconsin Congressional Political Courage Test. Did Not Check SUPPORT for: "k) Require a license for gun possession." Ron Kind. HR 6842. 110th Congress. Repealing Portions of the D.C. Firearm Ban. Ron Kind voted Yea on 09/17/2008. (votesmart.org) National Rifle Association. Project Vote Smart: Interest Group Endorsements. 04/18/2012. National Rifle Association endorsed Ron Kind in the 2010 general election. (votesmart.org) Ron Kind. H AMDT 1156. 110th Congress. Trigger Lock Amendment. Ron Kind voted Yea on 06/28/2006. (votesmart.org) Ron Kind. HR 2122. 106th Congress. Mandatory Gun Show Background Check Act. Ron Kind voted Nay on 06/18/1999. (votesmart.org) Ron Kind. S 397. 109th Congress. Firearms Manufacturers Protection Bill. Ron Kind voted Yea on 10/20/2005. (votesmart.org) Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence. 04/18/2012. "Ron Kind supported the interests of the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence 55 percent from 1988-2003 (Senate) or 1991-2003 (House)." (votesmart.org) Gun Owners of America. 04/18/2012. "In 2010 Gun Owners of America gave Ron Kind a grade of 55." (votesmart.org) Ronald Kind. Rep. Kind Statement on Supreme Court Decision Regarding Individual Gun Rights. 26 June 2008. "I have long been a supporter of individual gun rights for law-abiding citizens. The goal has always been to balance our constitutional rights with public safety. I believe the Court's historic decision today shows that the DC handgun ban simply went too far. The decision strikes the right balance - it upholds an individual's undeniable right to own a gun for self-defense or hunting purposes, while providing for reasonable restrictions in the interest of protecting the public - such as prohibiting guns in school zones, or preventing felons or the mentally ill from owning a gun." (votesmart.org)
I support current law and do not believe that new restrictions on the purchase and possession of guns should be imposed. As someone who has enjoyed hunting and fishing in scenic western Wisconsin my whole life, I am opposed to any legislation that would prevent law-abiding citizens from owning a gun. As a former local prosecutor, however, I have dealt with the effects of gun violence first-hand, and as a father and a husband, I am convinced that firearms should not fall into the hands of convicted felons.

Health Care

No		Do you support repealing the 2010 Affordable Care Act?
Yes		Should individuals be required to purchase health insurance, as mandated in the 2010 Affordable Care Act?
The individual responsibility requirement in health care reform is really an upfront fee paid by consumers who choose to pass their health care costs onto everyone with insurance. A study published during the health care reform debate showed that it costs a family over $1,000 in increased health care premiums to pay for the cost shift by providers to make up the lost revenue of those that go without coverage and can't pay their bills. Getting everyone into the system allows the ACA to include the critical patient protections that put consumers back in charge of their health care.

Immigration

		Do you support allowing illegal immigrants, who were brought to the United States as minors, to pursue citizenship without returning to their country of origin?
		Do you support the enforcement of federal immigration law by state and local police?
No		Do you support requiring illegal immigrants to return to their country of origin before they are eligible for citizenship?
Ron Kind. Project Vote Smart: 2004 Wisconsin Congressional Political Courage Test. Did Not Check SUPPORT for: "e) Support amnesty for certain illegal immigrants who already reside in the United States." Ron Kind. Project Vote Smart: 2000 Wisconsin Congressional Political Courage Test. Did Not Check SUPPORT for: "e) Prohibit states from passing laws that deny human services (medical care, education) to illegal immigrants or their children." Ron Kind. Project Vote Smart: 2000 Wisconsin Congressional Political Courage Test. Did Not Check SUPPORT for: "f) Grant U.S. citizenship to children born in the US only if their parents immigrated legally." Ron Kind. Project Vote Smart: 1996 Wisconsin Congressional Political Courage Test. Did Not Check SUPPORT for: "c) Ease citizenship requirements in order to make it easier for immigrants to become United States citizens." Ron Kind. Project Vote Smart: 1998 Wisconsin Congressional Political Courage Test. Did Not Check SUPPORT for: "f) Children of illegal immigrants, born in the United States, should not automatically receive U.S. citizenship." Ron Kind. Project Vote Smart: 1996 Wisconsin Congressional Political Courage Test. Did Not Check SUPPORT for: "g) Children of illegal immigrants, born in the United States, should not automatically receive US citizenship." Ron Kind. HR 4437. 109th Congress. Border Security Bill. Ron Kind voted Nay on 12/16/2005. (votesmart.org) Ron Kind. HR 5281. 112th Congress. DREAM Act. Ron Kind voted Yea on 12/08/2010. (votesmart.org) Federation for American Immigration Reform. 04/18/2012. "Ron Kind supported the interests of the Federation for American Immigration Reform 33 percent in 2010." (votesmart.org) National Latino Congreso/William C. Velásquez Institute. 04/18/2012. "Ron Kind supported the interests of National Latino Congreso/William C. Velásquez Institute 50 percent in 2010." (votesmart.org) Ronald Kind. Project Vote Smart: 2012 Wisconsin Congressional Political Courage Test. Selected NO ANSWER for: "Do you support requiring illegal immigrants to return to their country of origin before they are eligible for citizenship?" Immigration other or expanded principles: "I support comprehensive reform that not only bolsters enforcement of immigration laws but also provides a practical solution for the 12 million undocumented immigrants residing within our borders. I would support legislation that would provide otherwise law-abiding undocumented workers with permanent legal status through a new legalization program as part of comprehensive immigration reform." Signed a letter stating “While we work towards the goal of comprehensive immigration reform in Congress, we encourage you to exercise your authority to provide relief to millions of families from unnecessary detention and deportation.” https://delbene.house.gov/sites/delbene.house.gov/files/Final%20-%20Immigration%20Letter%20to%20President%20Obama.pdf (delbene.house.gov) “We want you to know you can rely on the New Democrat Coalition to support a comprehensive and bipartisan immigration package that includes a pathway to citizenship.” http://newdemocratcoalition-kind.house.gov/sites/newdemocratcoalition.house.gov/files/polisscans_20130802_162613.pdf (newdemocratcoalition-kind.house.gov)
I support comprehensive reform that not only bolsters enforcement of immigration laws but also provides a practical solution for the 12 million undocumented immigrants residing within our borders. I would support legislation that would provide otherwise law-abiding undocumented workers with permanent legal status through a new legalization program as part of comprehensive immigration reform.

Marriage

Yes		Do you support same-sex marriage?
Ron Kind. Project Vote Smart: 2004 Wisconsin Congressional Political Courage Test. Selected "Yes" for: "j) Should same-sex couples be allowed to form civil unions?" Human Rights Campaign. 04/18/2012. "Ron Kind supported the interests of the Human Rights Campaign 88 percent in 2010." (votesmart.org) Family Research Council. 04/18/2012. "Ron Kind supported the interests of the Family Research Council 0 percent in 2006." (votesmart.org) Traditional Values Coalition. 04/18/2012. "Ron Kind supported the interests of the Traditional Values Coalition 0 percent in 2006" (votesmart.org) American Civil Liberties Union. 04/18/2012. "Ron Kind supported the interests of the American Civil Liberties Union 95 percent in 2006." (votesmart.org) Ron Kind. HR 2965. 112th Congress. Don't Ask, Don't Tell Repeal Act. Ron Kind voted Yea on 12/15/2010. (votesmart.org) Ron Kind. H J Res 88. 110th Congress. Same-Sex Marriage Resolution. Ron Kind voted Did Not Vote on 07/18/2006. (votesmart.org) American Family Association. 04/18/2012. "Ron Kind supported the interests of the American Family Association 5 percent in 2010." (votesmart.org) Ron Kind. HR 3685. 110th Congress. Sexual Orientation Employment Nondiscrimination Act (ENDA). Ron Kind voted Yea on 11/07/2007. (votesmart.org) Ronald Kind. Marriage Protection Amendment. 18 July 2006. "I am opposed to amending the Constitution for the purpose of outlawing gay marriage. In its 2I5-year history, the Constitution has been amended only 27 times, and we must not add amendments limiting rights rather than expanding them." (votesmart.org) Signed a letter stating “We write to ask you to formally recognize for all federal purposes the marriages between same-sex couples that have been performed in the State of Wisconsin since a federal district judge invalidated the state's constitutional amendment barring same-sex marriage on June 6.” http://votesmart.org/public-statement/882652/letter-to-eric-holder-united-states-attorney-general-marriage-licenses-for-wisconsin-same-sex-couples#.VX7jP3UVhHw (votesmart.org) “This decision is an important step toward full equality for all Wisconsinites. If two people want to make a lifetime commitment to love and care for one another, then the government shouldn't stand in the way.” https://kind.house.gov/latest-news/rep-ron-kind-statement-on-overturning-of-samesex-marriage-ban-in-wisconsin/ (kind.house.gov) “This decision marks another step toward full equality for all Wisconsinites. I applaud the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals for ruling on the side of equal rights. Clearly, momentum is on the side of marriage equality. The government shouldn't stand in the way of two people who want to make a lifetime commitment to one another.” http://votesmart.org/public-statement/932994/rep-ron-kind-statement-on-appeals-court-decision-in-favor-of-marriage-equality-for-wisconsin#.VX7in3UVhHw (votesmart.org) "This decision is an important step toward full equality for all Wisconsinites. If two people want to make a lifetime commitment to love and care for one another, then the government shouldn't stand in the way." https://kind.house.gov/latest-news/rep-ron-kind-statement-on-overturning-of-samesex-marriage-ban-in-wisconsin/ (kind.house.gov) "This decision marks another step toward full equality for all Wisconsinites. I applaud the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals for ruling on the side of equal rights. Clearly, momentum is on the side of marriage equality. The government shouldn't stand in the way of two people who want to make a lifetime commitment to one another." http://votesmart.org/public-statement/932994/rep-ron-kind-statement-on-appeals-court-decision-in-favor-of-marriage-equality-for-wisconsin#.VX7in3UVhHw (votesmart.org) Signed a letter stating "We write to ask you to formally recognize for all federal purposes the marriages between same-sex couples that have been performed in the State of Wisconsin since a federal district judge invalidated the state's constitutional amendment barring same-sex marriage on June 6." http://votesmart.org/public-statement/882652/letter-to-eric-holder-united-states-attorney-general-marriage-licenses-for-wisconsin-same-sex-couples#.VX7jP3UVhHw (votesmart.org)

National Security

		Should the U.S use military force in order to prevent Iran from possessing a nuclear weapon?
No		Do you support targeting suspected terrorists outside of official theaters of conflict?
Ron Kind. Project Vote Smart: 2004 Wisconsin Congressional Political Courage Test. Selected "No" for: "f) Do you support a policy of pre-emptive strikes against countries deemed to be a threat to national security?" Ronald Kind. Project Vote Smart: 2012 Wisconsin Congressional Political Courage Test. Selected NO ANSWER for: "Do you support targeting suspected terrorists outside of official theaters of conflict?" National Security other or expanded principles: "I support the congressional authorization of military force against al Qaeda and its affiliates around the world." Ronald Kind. Kind Sees Pakistan As Key To Regional Stability. 17 Novemeber 2009. "Kind, who traveled to Pakistan as part of a four-member congressional delegation, said his discussions with U.S. and Pakistani officials gave him a better understanding of the key role that Pakistan will play when it comes to stability in the region. And he argues that Obama's forthcoming new strategy in Afghanistan should encompass ways to work with Pakistani officials to root out terrorists in the area [¦] 'The true key to stability lies in the success of Pakistan,' Kind said in a phone call with reporters Monday after returning from his trip. 'It is in Pakistan where most of the Taliban and al-Qaida leadership reside' [¦] 'Pakistan sits in the middle of the breeding ground for extreme terrorism that affects us all. They have been hit by more terrorist attacks and are doing more to capture and kill terrorists than any other country.'" (votesmart.org) Ronald Kind. Kind Statement on the Death of Osama Bin Laden. 2 May 2011. "The world is a better place today without Osama Bin Laden [¦] Hopefully this sends a signal to the other perpetrators of the 9/11 attacks that there is no place too remote or no cave too dark to find them and bring them to justice." (votesmart.org) “As a former prosecutor, I have been an advocate for strong judicial oversight of any program that involves the privacy rights of American citizens – lack of strong judicial and congressional oversight was the reason why I voted against reauthorization of the Patriot Act a few years ago. We need all three branches of our government involved to prevent the overreach of any one branch.” http://votesmart.org/public-statement/877030/rep-ron-kind-statement-on-the-usa-freedom-act#.VX7kmHUVhHw (votesmart.org) “I support President Obama and this new direction for winding down our efforts in Iraq and increasing our troop presence in Afghanistan. This bill is absolutely necessary to ensuring that our troops have the tools, equipment, and training to help keep them out of harm's way and that our mission is successful in the fight on terror.” http://kind.house.gov/latest-news/rep-kind-votes-to-support-needs-of-troops/ (kind.house.gov) “President Obama has announced up to 300 military advisers would be sent to support Iraq against ISIS. We should continue to avoid sending combat troops back into Iraq.” http://kind.house.gov/foreign-affairs (kind.house.gov)
I support the congressional authorization of military force against al Qaeda and its affiliates around the world. For over two decades, Iran has pursued nuclear weapons in direct violation of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, to which they are a signatory. It is very important that we successfully deter any Iranian attempts to acquire nuclear weapons, both for our allies' national security as well as our own. We should not take any response off the table. I believe that with a multifaceted approach, utilizing diplomacy as well as enacted sanctions, we can ensure that Iran does not gain nuclear weapons.

Social Security

No		Do you support allowing individuals to divert a portion of their Social Security taxes into personal retirement accounts?
As a member of the Ways and Means Committee, which has jurisdiction over Social Security, I am committed to finding responsible solutions to address the long-term financing challenges facing the program. I know we can find a way to ensure Social Security remains strong for today's seniors while making sure future generations can rely on it too. As part of my commitment to protect its solvency, I strongly oppose privatizing Social Security because it would rob money from the system that is needed to pay benefits for today's seniors.

Spending and Taxes

SpendingIndicate what federal spending levels (#1-6) you support for the following general categories. Select one number per category; you can use a number more than once.TaxesIndicate what federal tax levels (#1-6) you support for the following general categories. Select one number per category; you can use a number more than once.

Slightly Decrease		a) Agriculture
Maintain Status		b) Arts
Slightly Decrease		c) Defense
Greatly Increase		d) Education
Maintain Status		e) Environment
Maintain Status		f) Homeland Security
Slightly Decrease		g) International aid
Greatly Increase		h) Medical Research
Greatly Increase		i) Scientific Research
Slightly Decrease		j) Space exploration
Maintain Status		k) United Nations
Maintain Status		l) Welfare
		m) Other or expanded categories
Maintain Status		a) Capital gains taxes
Greatly Decrease		b) Corporate taxes
Maintain Status		c) Excise taxes (alcohol)
Maintain Status		d) Excise taxes (cigarettes)
Maintain Status		e) Excise taxes (transportation fuel)
Maintain Status		f) Income taxes (low-income families)
Maintain Status		g) Income taxes (middle-income families)
Slightly Increase		h) Income taxes (high-income families)
Maintain Status		i) Inheritance taxes
Maintain Status		j) Payroll taxes
Individual and corporate tax reform is necessary to broaden the tax base and lower rates to help make our businesses more competitive internationally.

Administrative Priorities

Fostering an environment to help businesses in western Wisconsin create jobs is my number one priority. Though our economy has grown in the last two years, we all know more has to be done to get it back on track creating good paying jobs again. As a member on the tax-writing House Ways and Means Committee, I'm committed to making the tough decisions to actually cut wasteful and unnecessary spending. I support a balanced plan to address our budget deficits by cutting spending and asking powerful special interests to contribute their fair share by eliminating tax loopholes.

Vote Smart does not permit the use of its name or programs in any campaign activity, including advertising, debates, and speeches.

What else does Kind say?

Ron Kind's Issue Positions (Political Courage Test)

Key

Issue Positions

This candidate has responded to a Political Courage Test in a previous election. As a continued effort to provide the American public with factual information on candidates running for public office, these archived responses are made available here.

Abortion

Afghanistan

Budget

Campaign Finance

Capital Punishment

Economy

Education

Energy

Environment

Guns

Health Care

Immigration

Marriage

National Security

Social Security

Spending and Taxes

Administrative Priorities

Navigation

Our Mission