Election: Nov. 2, 2010 (General)
Outcome: Passed
Categories:
LegalPresent Constitution provides that a majority of the judges of the court of appeal sitting in a case must concur to render judgment. In civil matters only, when a judgment of a district court is to be modified or reversed and one judge dissents, the case is required to be reargued before a panel of at least five judges prior to rendition of judgment and a majority must concur to render judgment.
Proposed Constitutional Amendment retains present law and provides that in civil matters only, when a judgment of a district court or an administrative agency determination in a workers' compensation claim is to be modified or reversed and one judge dissents, the case is required to be reargued before a panel of at least five judges prior to rendition of judgment and a majority shall concur to render judgment.
To provide that, in civil matters only, when a court of appeal is to modify or reverse an administrative agency determination in a workers' compensation claim and one judge dissents, the case shall be reargued before a panel of at least five judges prior to rendition of judgment, and a majority shall concur to render judgment. (Amends Article V, Section 8(B))
FOR [ ]
AGAINST [ ]