Letter to Ben Carson, Secretary of the Department of Housing and Urban Development - Wexton Leads Bicameral Response to Trump Administration's Anti-Trans Equal Access Rule Change

Letter

By: Jacky Rosen, Catherine Cortez Masto, Maggie Hassan, Tina Smith, Amy Klobuchar, Gary Peters, Chris Van Hollen, Jr., Ben Cardin, Elizabeth Warren, Dick Durbin, Brian Schatz, Richard Blumenthal, Kamala Harris, Dianne Feinstein, Gwen Moore, Mark Pocan, Denny Heck, Adam Smith, Pramila Jayapal, Derek Kilmer, Suzan DelBene, Peter Welch, Gerry Connolly, Don Beyer, Jr., Donald McEachin, Eddie Johnson, Sylvia Garcia, Joaquin Castro, Sheila Jackson Lee, Al Green, Steve Cohen, Jim Cooper, Jim Langevin, David Cicilline, Mike Doyle, Jr., Susan Wild, Mary Scanlon, Madeleine Dean, Brendan Boyle, Peter DeFazio, Earl Blumenauer, Suzanne Bonamici, Marcia Fudge, Brian Higgins, Sean Maloney, Eliot Engel, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Adriano Espaillat, Max Rose, Jerry Nadler, Yvette Clarke, Nydia Velázquez, Grace Meng, Gregory Meeks, Dina Titus, Deb Haaland, Bonnie Watson Coleman, Frank Pallone, Jr., Ann Kuster, Alma Adams, Ilhan Omar, Betty McCollum, Angie Craig, Brenda Lawrence, Rashida Tlaib, Debbie Dingell, Dan Kildee, Chellie Pingree, Jamie Raskin, David Trone, Stephen Lynch, Ayanna Pressley, Seth Moulton, Katherine Clark, Joe Kennedy III, Lori Trahan, Jim McGovern, John Yarmuth, Sharice Davids, André Carson, Cheri Bustos, Bill Foster, Jan Schakowsky, Danny Davis, Sean Casten, Mike Quigley, Chuy Garcia, Cindy Axne, Edward Case, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Ted Deutch, Alcee Hastings, Sr., Kathy Castor, Charlie Crist, Jr., Val Demings, Darren Soto, Al Lawson, Jr., Lisa Blunt Rochester, Jahana Hayes, Rosa DeLauro, Joe Courtney, John Larson, Jason Crow, Tammy Baldwin, Patty Murray, Bernie Sanders, Patrick Leahy, Sheldon Whitehouse, Jack Reed, Jeff Merkley, Ron Wyden, Sherrod Brown, Kirsten Gillibrand, Diana DeGette, Alan Lowenthal, Nanette Barragán, Maxine Waters, Mark Takano, Lucille Roybal-Allard, Gil Cisneros, Linda Sánchez, Karen Bass, Norma Torres, Grace Napolitano, Pete Aguilar, Brad Sherman, Judy Chu, Julia Brownley, T.J. Cox, Jimmy Panetta, Zoe Lofgren, Anna Eshoo, Ro Khanna, Jim Costa, Jackie Speier, Barbara Lee, Mark DeSaulnier, Jerry McNerney, Ami Bera, Doris Matsui, Ruben Gallego, Raul Grijalva, Jennifer Wexton
Date: July 30, 2020
Location: Washington, DC

Dear Secretary Carson:

We write to voice our opposition to the Department of Housing and Urban Development's (HUD) proposed rule change to the Equal Access Rule, HUD Docket No. FR-6152-P-01, RIN 2506-AC53, "Making Admission or Placement Determinations Based on Sex in Facilities Under Community Planning and Development Housing Programs." This proposed change to the Equal Access Rule weakens protections for transgender individuals experiencing homelessness, essentially empowering federally funded emergency homeless service providers to discriminately turn them away. We strongly urge that HUD immediately rescind this anti-transgender proposal.

The Equal Access Rule of 2012 ensured that HUD's Community Development and Planning Programs are open to all eligible individuals and families regardless of sexual orientation, gender identity, or marital status. The Equal Access Rule of 2016 further clarified these protections by providing notice to shelter providers of their responsibility to grant equal access in accordance to an individual's self-expressed gender identity, further ensuring that hundreds of thousands of people have access to a basic human necessity, safe shelter. HUD's proposed rule change would sow confusion among service providers as to their responsibilities to serve transgender and nonbinary people under the law. In some cases, it would empower shelter providers that want to discriminate against transgender people to do so. For transgender and nonbinary people who are experiencing homelessness, the lack of confidence in the existence of protections against discrimination is likely to result in many people feeling forced to remain on the street, where they are at further risk of physical violence, abuse, and other physical and mental health effects of homelessness.

This anti-transgender proposal directly targets a group that has historically and disproportionately suffered from the hardships of homelessness. Transgender individuals are far more likely than the general population to experience homelessness and discrimination while seeking emergency sheltering services. According to the 2015 US Transgender Survey, nearly one-third of transgender people experience homelessness at some point in their life and 70 percent reported mistreatment in shelter due to their gender identity. Only 50 percent of the LGBTQ+ population lives in states prohibiting housing discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity. The Equal Access Rule of 2016 filled a gap by providing substantive protections nationwide and ensuring that transgender people can pursue safe sheltering that is consistent with their gender identity without fear of discrimination. Removing these protections puts individuals living in states without protections at risk of being left on the streets.

We also cannot ignore the critical intersection with race. It should be noted that Black, Indigenous and People-of-Color face particular vulnerabilities, experiencing disproportionately higher rates of homelessness and discrimination. Of the 19% of transgender people who reported experiencing homelessness in their lifetime, 41% were Black, 33% were American Indian, 32% were multiracial, and 32% were Latino/a.

The housing system has already failed the LGBTQ+ community, particularly transgender people. Allowing homeless and emergency service providers to deny admission to an individual "based on good faith" beliefs and perception based on physical characteristics invites sex stereotyping and discrimination. The adoption of this rule would only unnecessarily exacerbate these systemic failures and further harm the transgender community and its most vulnerable members.

The Trump administration's proposed rule consistently cites supposed safety concerns as a reason for the need of the proposal, but HUD provides no evidence that allowing transgender people to access facilities in accordance with their gender identity puts others at risk. Nondiscrimination protections have been in place for years in over 20 states and over 300 localities without any increase in public safety issues. This fictitious justification only perpetuates harmful and dangerous stereotypes of transgender people who are seeking safe shelter and other emergency services.

The proposed rule also suggests that "the 2016 rule burdened those shelters with deeply held religious convictions." Again, HUD cites no evidence that the existing rule is placing an undue burden on faith-based shelter providers. In response to a Freedom of Information Act request in 2017, HUD was unable to locate any requests for waivers or accommodations or complaints made under the 2012 and 2016 Equal Access Rule. This, again, demonstrates that HUD is seeking to justify such a malicious attack on transgender people without any evidence or validity in their claims.

This type of discriminatory policy is always inappropriate and unjust. Proposing a rule that targets an already marginalized group is especially egregious as we are amidst a global pandemic, where economic, health, and housing insecurity are at an all-time high. This effort is clearly inconsistent with HUD's mission to "build inclusive and sustainable communities free from discrimination." Instead of disrupting access to safe shelter and emergency services for transgender people, we urge you to immediately rescind the proposal. We suggest you instead focus your efforts on ensuring adequate and equitable solutions to mitigate the effects that COVID-19 has had on housing stability and shelter access for not only the transgender community, but for all individuals in need.

Sincerely,


Source
arrow_upward