Card image cap

Dana Rohrabacher's Ratings and Endorsements

Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issue concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

With rare exceptions, Vote Smart displays interest group ratings as a 0-100 percentage. While many interest groups use percentages as ratings to begin with, please note that Vote Smart has translated some ratings to a percentage from a different rating system for consistency and ease in understanding. Please visit the group's website, email us at ratings@votesmart.org or call our Voter Information Hotline at 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

11%
2017
11%
2017
100%
2015-2016
100%
2015-2016
94%
2009-2010
100%
2007-2008
86%
2005-2006
67%
2003
86%
2017-2018
+2
2001-2002
7%
2013-2014
7%
2013-2014
23%
2013-2014
23%
2013-2014
20%
2013
0%
2012
25%
2003-2004
25%
2003-2004
0%
2003
0%
2001-2002
0%
2001-2002
0%
2000
0%
1999
33%
1998
25%
1997
0%
1996
100%
2012
100%
2012
0%
2015-2016
14%
2013-2014
100%
2003
88%
2004
100%
2011
100%
2009-2010
80%
2007-2008
84%
2004
84%
2003
92%
2002
93%
1999-2000
93%
1997-1998
100%
1997
100%
1995-1996
93%
1991-1992
93%
1991-1992
93%
2011-2012
92%
2011
100%
2009-2010
81%
2007-2008
54%
2005-2006
91%
2003-2004
92%
2003
93%
2001-2002
100%
2000
25%
1997-1998
75%
1995-1996
100%
2013-2014
100%
2013-2014
94%
2009
0
2005
40%
2013-2014
65%
2009-2010
65%
2009-2010
16
2007-2008
0%
2005-2006
83%
2015-2016
83%
2015-2016
95%
2015
90%
2014
76%
2014
92%
2013-2014
92%
2013-2014
90%
2013
75%
2011-2012
75%
2011-2012
80%
2011
90%
2011
100%
2010
83%
2009-2010
83%
2009-2010
80%
2009-2010
80%
2009-2010
88%
2009-2010
88%
2009-2010
90%
2009
85%
2009
80%
2009
79%
2007-2008
79%
2007-2008
70%
2007
57%
2006
75%
2005
80%
2004
75%
2004
38%
2003
75%
2002
80%
2001
87%
2000
85%
1999
85%
1998
85%
1997
76%
1995-1996
76%
1995-1996
arrow_upward