Card image cap

Edmond Gionet's Ratings and Endorsements

Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issue concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

With rare exceptions, Vote Smart displays interest group ratings as a 0-100 percentage. While many interest groups use percentages as ratings to begin with, please note that Vote Smart has translated some ratings to a percentage from a different rating system for consistency and ease in understanding. Please visit the group's website, email us at ratings@votesmart.org or call our Voter Information Hotline at 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

50%
2015-2016
43%
2015-2016
30%
2013-2014
90
2011-2012
100
2011-2012
82
2011-2012
92
2011-2012
100
2011-2012
50%
2008
50%
2007
55%
2006
20%
2004
57%
2015-2016
43%
2015-2016
30%
2013-2014
90
2011-2012
100
2011-2012
82
2011-2012
92
2011-2012
100
2011-2012
50%
2008
50%
2007
55%
2006
20%
2004
43%
2015-2016
43%
2015-2016
57%
2015-2016
50%
2015-2016
50%
2015-2016
30%
2013-2014
30%
2013-2014
90
2011-2012
92
2011-2012
100
2011-2012
92
2011-2012
100
2011-2012
100
2011-2012
100
2011-2012
82
2011-2012
82
2011-2012
90
2011-2012
50%
2008
50%
2008
50%
2007
50%
2007
55%
2006
55%
2006
20%
2004
20%
2004
84%
2016
74%
2015
74%
2015
74%
2014
74%
2014
79%
2013
79%
2013
92
2011-2012
94
2011-2012
94
2011-2012
92
2011-2012
82%
2010
82%
2010
84%
2009
84%
2009
75
2007-2008
75
2007-2008
74
2007
74
2007
77 %
2006
77 %
2006
72%
2005-2006
72%
2005-2006
61 %
2005
61 %
2005
arrow_upward