BREAK IN TRANSCRIPT
HAYES: Much more information has come to light since Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Richard Burr made those comments way back in September, including the revelation that Paul Manafort shared polling data with an associate linked to Russian intelligence while Manafort was actively the chair of the Trump campaign.
But Burr echoed those comments again in an interview just last week, telling CBS News if we write a report based upon the fact that we have, we don`t have anything that would suggest there was collusion by the Trump campaign and Russia, he said.
Bipartisan sources gave a similar account to NBC News, claiming the committee is close to wrapping up its investigation without finding direct evidence of a conspiracy.
Now Burr`s vice chairman Mark Warner is pushing back, publicly breaking with Burr for what maybe the first time in the two-year course of their investigation. Warner telling CNN he disagrees about the evidence of collusion and that the probe has yet to finish.
I`m now now by a member Senate Intelligence Committee, Democratic Senator Ron Wyden of Oregon, and since you are a member on that committee, what do make of all of of this?
SEN. RON WYDEN, (D) OREGON: Well, I disagree strongly with the chairman, Chris.
And here is the bottom line, in my opinion, if it looks like collusion and acts like collusion, and you have someone like Paul Manafort sharing confidential political intelligence with the Russians, it`s collusion.
HAYES: Does that mean that you -- let me ask you this, is it your understand of the progress of the committee`s report that essentially facts as you are able to ascertain them, have more or less all been gathered and now it`s just a matter of issuing some final report, coming to some final judgments, and differing interpretations of what those facts mean?
WYDEN: No. In my opinion, there is still a lot of heavy lifting to do, particularly as it relates to counterintelligence 101, which is following the money. For example, this Moscow Tower issue. And what we know from public sources -- I can`t get into confidential matters -- but what we know from public sources is especially troubling.
Michael Cohen, he is the money man for the Trump administration, he has already said that the discussions went on much longer than was originally said. In effect you had the president of the United States out talking to the American people about how he was going to find a way to have a new relationship with Putin, and yet from public sources we were hearing reports about the prospect that he might make millions and millions of dollars on that Moscow Tower.
So in my own opinion there`s a lot of work to do.
HAYES: Does the chair, or do your Republican colleagues, consider something like that as within the purview of what`s being investigated by the committee?
WYDEN: I certainly do and the reason I do is that this has always been about how the Russians might get leverage on Donald Trump.
We already know that Donald Trump, without saying very much, we saw that bizarre press conference, we`ve seen the change in sanctions policy, we know that without a lot of explanation, he has made a real break with previous policies.
And so the whole point of the follow the money questions is to try to make sure that at the end of our inquiry we know whose interests Donald Trump is advocating for, his wallet or the American people.
HAYES: Another money flow that you have been focused on, and I wanted to get an update on the progress about the ties between the NRA and the Kremlin. There`s been all sorts of reporting that the ways in which Russia and Russian leaders sort of cultivated the NRA as an ally. There`s some questions about the source of NRA money that flowed into the campaign. You wrote a letter to them.
What have you been able to learn? Is that part of the investigation as well?
WYDEN: With respect to that area, I`m also the ranking Democrat on the Senate Finance Committee. The Finance Committee staff is looking at it. We`ll have more to stay before too long. But when the NRA said that that trip to Moscow was not an official trip, I want your viewers to know I don`t think that that is credible, and certainly when you`re talking, again, about a tax exempt organization, we want to know who their loyalties run to. Do they run to the American people or to some foreign adversary?
HAYES: Final question. Is there an expectation on your part, or have there -- you had discussions with Democratic colleagues on the Intelligence Committee about a final report or some kind of minority report that might be issued, similar to the minority report in the House last year?
WYDEN: We`re barred from getting into those kinds of discussions. But let me tell you what I`m going to do, Chris, I will read any report, line by line, and if I think there is anything resembling a cover up with respect to import facts, I`ll blow the whistle. I`ll do it in a way that protects classified sources. But I`m going to make sure the truth gets to the American people.
HAYES: All right, Senator Ron Wyden on the Intelligence Committee. Thank you very much, senator.
WYDEN: Thank you.
BREAK IN TRANSCRIPT