Letter to Honorable Merrick Garland, Attorney General and Honorable Christopher Wray, Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation - Grassley Again Seeks Update On Referrals Of Bogus Allegations During Kavanaugh Confirmation

Letter

Date: March 23, 2021
Location: Washington, DC

Dear Attorney General Garland and Director Wray:

On October 8, 2019, several colleagues and I wrote a letter to Attorney General Barr and Director Wray requesting an update concerning their handling of criminal referrals made by the Committee following its investigation into allegations of decades-old misconduct by then-Judge Brett Kavanaugh.[1] To date, the Justice Department and FBI have failed to respond to our letter and have failed to apprise the Committee whether, and to what extent, any steps have been taken to investigate and hold accountable those individuals who criminally interfered with the Committee's investigation.

These failures are entirely unacceptable. As my colleagues and I stressed in our previous letter, the Committee's four criminal referrals, dated September 29, 2018, October 25, 2018, October 26, 2018, and November 2, 2018, were not made lightly. Those referrals highlighted serious cases in which individuals made materially false, fictitious, and fraudulent statements to Committee investigators.

For example, one of the referrals related to an individual from Rhode Island who falsely alleged to Congress that Judge Kavanaugh had assaulted a friend on a boat, only to later admit on social media that he lied about the event.[2] Two referrals related to allegations made by Mr. Michael Avenatti and his client, Ms. Julie Swetnick, who accused Judge Kavanaugh of being involved in gang rape activities. The Committee identified no verifiable evidence to support the allegations. The Committee found that Mr. Avenatti, who has since been convicted on felony extortion charges, and his client, Ms. Swetnick, had a long history of credibility issues and may have criminally conspired to mislead the Committee regarding those allegations and obstruct its investigation.[3] A final referral related to Ms. Judy Munro-Leighton, a woman who claimed to be the author of an anonymous letter stating that Judge Kavanaugh and a friend raped her "several times each" in the back seat of a car. Ms. Munro-Leighton later admitted that she falsely claimed that she was the author of the letter and its allegations and only claimed authorship of the letter "as a way to grab attention."[4] These false allegations materially impeded the Committee's work and diverted important Committee resources during its time-sensitive investigation.

As Chairman, I rigorously performed my constitutional oversight role to vet Judge Kavanaugh, instructing my Committee investigators to investigate each and every serious allegation. My office later released a 414 page report of those investigative findings which did not include so much as a shred of evidence to support any of the allegations made against Judge Kavanaugh.

The FBI background checks -- two of them -- didn't uncover any such evidence, either. Both of those investigations followed the normal process for FBI background checks of judicial nominees. As then-Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee Joe Biden remarked in 1991, in a background investigation the FBI "do[es] not reach conclusions" and "do[es] not make recommendations."[5] It is the Senate's responsibility to weigh the information that it collects from the background investigations and from its own investigative work and make a fully informed decision. That's what happened here. In the end, the Senate weighed evidence assembled by the FBI and by veteran congressional investigators and fulfilled its Constitutional responsibility by confirming Judge Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court.

It is, however, the responsibility of the Justice Department and FBI to hold those who mislead and obstruct Congress accountable for their criminal behavior. Accordingly, I ask that you provide a response to the questions posed in the October 8, 2019, letter no later than April 6, 2021. Your response should include a full explanation of the steps the Justice Department and FBI have taken to investigate the Committee's four criminal referrals for investigation of potential violations of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1001 (materially false statements), 1505 (obstruction), and 371 (conspiracy). If no actions have been taken in response to those referrals, please explain why not.

Thank you for your attention to this important matter.

Sincerely,


Source
arrow_upward