SENATOR MARKEY STATEMENT ON THE BORDER ACT

Statement

“I have long prioritized pathways to citizenship, fair adjudication of asylum claims, limitations on detention, and more legal pathways to entry. Any of these policies would help the executive branch manage the border and the reception of new arrivals in the interior. None of these policies are present in the Border Act, and I voted no. It simply does not address the root causes of the situation at our southern border.

Our management strategy of new arrivals must include genuine expanded access. Without adequate legal pathways, people fleeing dangerous or oppressive conditions will only become more desperate and border communities will only become more chaotic. Detention and deportations should not be the only tools we use to respond to record levels of global migration. There are smarter steps the United States can take to manage high volumes of new arrivals. These include increased funding for Shelter and Services Programs (SSP), serious investment in immigration courts and asylum officers, increased investment in processing capacity at ports of entry, and creation of new legal pathways to entry. The United States can better manage high numbers of new arrivals without sacrificing fairness.

But these are the solutions that Congressional Republicans, in fealty to Donald Trump, will not support. They do not support a pathway to citizenship. They do not support our DREAMers. They do not support expanded investments to manage new arrivals. They do not support comprehensive immigration reform. They do not even support the Border Act, legislation that they asked for but voted against because Donald Trump told them to, saying ‘blame it on me’ when it gets defeated.

I will continue fighting in partnership with the Healey-Driscoll administration and the Congressional delegation for more funding for Massachusetts to continue to step up and provide services to new arrivals while they await their status determinations. Today, Senator Warren and I called on U.S. Senate appropriators to ensure that no less than $500 million in funding is devoted for a new Destination Reception Fund to complement the existing SSP funding in supporting new arrivals. This funding would support additional ongoing services and supports in destination states including Massachusetts, helping new arrivals attain self-sufficiency and reduce the use of expensive transition out of emergency shelters."

Source