Card image cap

Steve Eliason's Ratings and Endorsements

Office:

On The Ballot: Running, Republican for State House (UT) - District 43

Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issue concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

With rare exceptions, Vote Smart displays interest group ratings as a 0-100 percentage. While many interest groups use percentages as ratings to begin with, please note that Vote Smart has translated some ratings to a percentage from a different rating system for consistency and ease in understanding. Please visit the group's website, email us at ratings@votesmart.org or call our Voter Information Hotline at 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

56%
2023
62%
2022
56%
2022
66%
2021
60%
2020
53%
2019
43%
2018
61%
2017
83%
2016
46%
2015
55%
2014
24%
2013
31%
2012
43%
2011
39%
2022
39%
2022
54%
2021
54%
2021
41%
2021
41%
2021
40%
2019
40%
2019
36%
2019
36%
2019
41%
2018
41%
2018
27%
2018
27%
2018
43%
2017
43%
2017
37%
2017
37%
2017
29%
2016
29%
2016
44%
2016
44%
2016
45%
2015
45%
2015
46%
2015
46%
2015
47%
2014
47%
2014
42%
2014
42%
2014
33%
2013
33%
2013
48%
2013
48%
2013
58%
2012
58%
2012
45%
2012
45%
2012
83%
2015
94%
2015
83%
2014
80%
2014
80%
2013
73%
2012
50%
2020
50%
2020
55%
2019
55%
2019
42%
2018
42%
2018
57%
2016
57%
2016
38%
2015
38%
2015
88%
2014
88%
2014
50%
2013
50%
2013
0%
2012
38%
2011
38%
2011
66%
2023
56%
2022
62%
2022
66%
2021
60%
2020
53%
2019
43%
2018
61%
2017
83%
2016
46%
2015
55%
2014
24%
2013
31%
2012
43%
2011
62%
2021
69%
2020
75%
2019
88%
2018
84%
2018
83%
2017
92%
2017
100%
2016
82%
2016
85%
2015-2020
91%
2015
65%
2014
82%
2013
71%
2012
82%
2011
66%
2023
62%
2022
56%
2022
66%
2021
60%
2020
53%
2019
43%
2018
61%
2017
83%
2016
46%
2015
55%
2014
24%
2013
31%
2012
43%
2011
46%
2019
46%
2019
66%
2023
62%
2022
56%
2022
66%
2021
60%
2020
53%
2019
43%
2018
61%
2017
83%
2016
46%
2015
55%
2014
24%
2013
31%
2012
43%
2011
62%
2021
69%
2020
75%
2019
88%
2018
84%
2018
83%
2017
92%
2017
100%
2016
82%
2016
85%
2015-2020
91%
2015
65%
2014
82%
2013
71%
2012
82%
2011
arrow_upward