WE TRACK THOUSANDS OF POLITICIANS EACH AND EVERY DAY!

Their Biographies, Issue Positions, Voting Records, Public Statements, Ratings and their Funders.
Card image cap

Nan Hayworth's Ratings and Endorsements

Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issue concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

With rare exceptions, Vote Smart displays interest group ratings as a 0-100 percentage. While many interest groups use percentages as ratings to begin with, please note that Vote Smart has translated some ratings to a percentage from a different rating system for consistency and ease in understanding. Please visit the group's website, email us at ratings@votesmart.org or call our Voter Information Hotline at 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

100%
2011-2012
70%
2011
43%
2011-2012
43%
2011-2012
11%
2012
0%
2012
51%
2012
51%
2012
49%
2012
49%
2012
59%
2012
59%
2012
44%
2012
44%
2012
52%
2012
52%
2012
53%
2011
53%
2011
68%
2011-2012
68%
2011-2012
96%
2011
53%
2011
53%
2011
86%
2011
59%
2012
59%
2012
53%
2011
53%
2011
38%
2011
38%
2011
60%
2011
60%
2011
57%
2011-2012
52%
2012
60%
2011
70%
2011
100%
2011
19%
2011-2012
95%
2011-2012
8%
2011-2012
22%
2012
45%
2011
43%
2011-2012
43%
2011-2012
100%
2006-2012
100%
2006-2012
86%
2011-2012
75%
2011
75%
2011
8%
2011
100%
2011-2012
100%
2008-2011
100%
2008-2011
68%
2011-2012
68%
2011-2012
69%
2011
69%
2011
86%
2011
46%
2011
46%
2011
93%
2011-2012
56%
2011
100%
2011-2012
100%
2011-2012
38%
2012
8%
2011-2012
100%
2006-2012
100%
2006-2012
38%
2011
38%
2011
60%
2011
60%
2011
0%
2012
0%
2012
75%
2011-2012
75%
2011-2012
30%
2011-2012
100%
2008-2011
100%
2008-2011
0%
2012
51%
2012
51%
2012
56%
2012
56%
2012
49%
2012
49%
2012
47%
2011
47%
2011
19%
2011-2012
100%
2011-2012
100%
2011-2012
95%
2011-2012
8%
2011-2012
82%
2012
89%
2011-2012
96%
2011
96%
2011
25%
2012
25%
2012
53%
2011
53%
2011
53%
2011
53%
2011
49%
2011-2012
86%
2011
86%
2011
48%
2012
48%
2012
52%
2011
52%
2011
52%
2011
52%
2011
80%
2011-2012
100%
2011
100%
2011
50%
2011-2012
50%
2011-2012
60%
2011
70%
2011
70%
2011
60%
2011
69%
2011
69%
2011
93%
2011-2012
56%
2011
75%
2011-2012
75%
2011-2012
arrow_upward