Card image cap

Mike Bishop's Ratings and Endorsements

Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issue concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

With rare exceptions, Vote Smart displays interest group ratings as a 0-100 percentage. While many interest groups use percentages as ratings to begin with, please note that Vote Smart has translated some ratings to a percentage from a different rating system for consistency and ease in understanding. Please visit the group's website, email us at ratings@votesmart.org or call our Voter Information Hotline at 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

100%
2015-2016
100%
2017-2018
91%
2015-2016
20%
2017
25%
2015-2016
25%
2015-2016
27%
2015
90%
2001-2002
90%
2001-2002
90%
1999-2000
90%
1999-2000
0%
2016
0%
2018
96%
2017-2018
96%
2017-2018
94%
2016
88%
2015-2016
88%
2015-2016
82%
2015
82%
2015
100%
2015-2016
100%
2017-2018
88%
2015-2016
82%
2007-2008
100%
2005-2006
95%
2003-2004
82%
2001-2002
80%
2000
75%
2017-2018
6%
2016
6%
2016
14%
2017
14%
2017
60%
2015-2016
60%
2015-2016
100%
2015-2016
0%
2015-2016
6%
2016
6%
2016
0%
2015-2016
0%
2015-2016
84%
2015-2016
84%
2015-2016
91%
2015-2016
100%
2015-2016
91%
2015-2016
7%
2015-2016
7%
2015-2016
30%
2005-2006
0%
2015-2016
0%
2015-2016
0%
2015
0%
2014
0
2005-2006
0
2005-2006
20%
2017
25%
2015-2016
25%
2015-2016
27%
2015
96%
2017-2018
96%
2017-2018
94%
2016
88%
2015-2016
88%
2015-2016
82%
2015
82%
2015
78%
2017
100%
2016
91%
2015
92%
2015-2016
70%
2015
53%
2018
78%
2017
73%
2017
69%
2016
71%
2016
73%
2015
73%
2015
50%
2015-2016
50%
2015-2016
100%
2015-2016
20%
2017
25%
2015-2016
25%
2015-2016
27%
2015
0%
2018
0%
2015
80%
2015-2016
80%
2015-2016
6%
2016
6%
2016
78%
2017
100%
2016
91%
2015
68%
2017
68%
2017
76%
2016
76%
2016
67%
2015
67%
2015
55%
2015
55%
2015
74%
2017-2018
74%
2017-2018
71%
2017
71%
2017
71%
2016
71%
2016
71%
2015-2016
71%
2015-2016
72%
2015
72%
2015
72%
2015
72%
2015
79%
2013
79%
2013
0%
2015-2016
0%
2015-2016
100%
2015-2016
100%
2015-2016
90%
2017-2018
100%
2015-2016
100%
2015-2016
100%
2018
78%
2017
78%
2017
100%
2016
100%
2016
91%
2015
91%
2015
53%
2017-2018
53%
2017-2018
58%
2015-2016
58%
2015-2016
58%
2015-2016
58%
2015-2016
60%
2015
60%
2015
91%
2009-2010
68%
2017
68%
2017
76%
2016
76%
2016
67%
2015
67%
2015
92%
2015-2016
53%
2018
78%
2017
73%
2017
69%
2016
71%
2016
73%
2015
73%
2015
91%
2015-2016
0%
2015-2016
0%
2015-2016
80%
2015-2016
80%
2015-2016
50%
2015-2016
50%
2015-2016
arrow_upward