Card image cap

Dan Lipinski's Ratings and Endorsements on Issue: Environment

Vote Smart displays all known interest group ratings for each candidate and official, regardless of issue or bias.

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issue concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

With rare exceptions, Vote Smart displays interest group ratings as a 0-100 percentage. While many interest groups use percentages as ratings to begin with, please note that Vote Smart has translated some ratings to a percentage from a different rating system for consistency and ease in understanding. Please visit the group's website, email us at ratings@votesmart.org or call our Voter Information Hotline at 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

6%
2015-2016
16%
2013-2014
14%
2011-2012
16%
2007-2008
33%
2005-2006
89%
2005-2006
89%
2005-2006
100
2007
100%
2017-2018
100%
2017-2018
100%
2019
100%
2018
100%
2017
100%
2016
100%
2015
100%
2013
91%
2011-2012
100%
2011
86%
2009-2010
80%
2009
100%
2007-2008
100%
2007
90%
2005-2006
39%
2015
20%
2014
25%
2013
33%
2012
80%
2015-2016
80%
2015-2016
70%
2015
86%
2014
83%
2013
66%
2011-2012
66%
2011-2012
87%
2011
87%
2009
100%
2008
88%
2020
93%
2018
100%
2017
100%
2017
93%
2015-2016
93%
2015-2016
90%
2015
84%
2014
84%
2013-2014
84%
2013-2014
85%
2013
93%
2011-2012
93%
2011-2012
14%
2006-2012
14%
2006-2012
90%
2020
94%
2019-2020
91%
2019
97%
2019
91%
2018
90%
2018
96%
2017-2018
100%
2017
90%
2017
95%
2016
89%
2016
90%
2015-2016
89%
2014
87%
2013-2014
89%
2013
89%
2013
83%
2012
89%
2012
87%
2011-2012
91%
2011
91%
2011
91%
2010
100%
2010
92%
2009-2010
86%
2009
94%
2007-2008
90%
2007
92%
2006
83%
2005
85%
2005
arrow_upward